Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] Those who move to the land - a different POV in a different "language"

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Frank Fries" <frank.fries AT imagewireless.ca>
  • To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] Those who move to the land - a different POV in a different "language"
  • Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:44:45 -0600

Hi all,

I have read a number of posts in the archives where the definition of a "homesteader" is discussed, as well as recent discussions.

I think you likely all know that some expressions are only used in certain regions, or amongst certain groups, and others are a little more universal....

The expression "a rose by any other name would smell as sweet" is, I think quite widespread ? If you are not familiar with it, it is fairly intuitive to most people that it basically means "words only mean what we all agree that they mean".

Any language is just a bunch of sounds if you don't understand it - and languages and what words mean change over time....just read some old english from medieval times, or talk to some very young person (preferably using texting shorthand) and you will see that languages change.

The area I grew up in and live in, was "settled" later than a lot of other areas on this continent. The governments of the time was granting "homesteads" to settlers in the period from 1872 to 1930. As I understand it, you were granted a "homestead" and you had a specified period (a few years - perhaps 3-5) to "prove up" your homestead - which consisted of a defined number of improvements, including a minimum number of acres to be broken and seeded and the building of a house of some kind. Free title to the land did not transfer until the homestead was "proved up" and could not be sold before this. You could only be eligible for one homestead (land grant). Homesteads were all for one quarter section.

Some new settlers chose to buy farms that were already broken instead. This was less work of course but required money.

In my area, the people who "homesteaded" these land grants (homesteads), were referred to as "homesteaders". I suspect that in the early days, this distinguished between those who did it the hard way (the homesteaders) and the others who did not "homestead" but bought instead.

When I was growing up, the original "homesteaders" were all becoming somewhat elderly or had already expired. When people referred to "the homesteaders" when I was a child, it was usually with respect for the people who worked so hard settling this land and building the original communities and was not completely unrelated to the term "senior citizen".

So when I hear "homesteader", I think of people who came before - not a current thing.

In those early days, many of those original "homesteaders", who were granted a "homestead" by the government, likely considered themselves to be "modern" and "progressive" using the newest tools and machinery with their horses and oxen. Many of them went on to buy more land and farm it. This would be the start of the "agri-biz" model.

I know my view of the word is quite localized - but it is the "language" I grew up with. I am always bemused by these discussions.

Gene's description of a "back to the lander" has some resonance with me.

I grew up on a farm - and wished I was a town kid when I was a kid (they were in town and got to play with all the other kids, etc). I resented that as a farm kid, we all had chores and had to milk the cow, work in the garden, gather the eggs, help butcher and pluck chickens, etc. I was glad to leave for the city when I was a young man.

I soon missed the country and longed to be able to move back to it. I came to appreciate and value the work ethic I was raised with, and the knowledge of where food really came from. That is, it doesn't come from the store - they only sell it - it actually came from somewhere else. Some people are starting to realize that now, particularily with all the food recalls

Eventually, I got the chance to get back to the country.

I don't expect to ever live off of my quarter but I surely take pleasure in the things I can do to be more self-reliant. I have become more interested in the garden every year, and every year I have learned a little more about growing and canning/preserving food, etc. I cut my own wood for heat because I have 50 acres of bush on the quarter and I am happy that I am able to do so. These things all add to "quality of life" for me, even though mostly they are a bunch of extra work compared to living in town.

I look forward to feeding the animals, and get a real kick out of watching the lambs bounce around the pasture in the spring. This year was the first year we sold any amount of lambs - the money they brought in was fine, but it was not the reason for raising them. We raise them first of all because we like to, second because we know they are good food and have not been raised with a bunch of chemicals and hormones added and lastly, we can sell the excess - this year over 20 lambs.

So, I am not sure if I am a "homesteader" or not (I am not THAT old).

I do see that I take pleasure and pride in raising some of my own food and have that in common with most of you. Most of you have knowledge and experiences that are valuable to share.

Not all of what I read can be directly applied. Some of the areas you live in are quite a bit different from mine, but it is the attitude and the approach you tend to use that I value. Mostly, you try and work with mother nature, rather than trying to overpower her.

As an example, I read with interest the discussion about gypsum being added to soil to loosen heavy clay. I had never heard of adding gypsum - nobody here does that. There is some heavy clay to the south of me (but not on my land) and also there was in the area I grew up in. I would be curious if it will work here (although just adding something to the soil sounds like the "agri-biz" model) <g>.

Frank,




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page