Homestead mailing list

["Lynda" <lurine AT softcom.net>]

You don't have any evidence whatsoever to back up that statement.  Because 
the doctor decided to induce labor doesn't not mean that she thought it was 
"necessary," nor that she thought it was a "big deal."

It is just as much a likely scenario that since she had ongoing contractions 
that weren't going into full labor, that she had started "leaking," that 
THEY discussed it and decided to go ahead and induce labor.  They could just 
as easily have decided to take a wait and watch approach or even a "let's 
admit you and see if this progresses" approach.

You are making a judgment without being in full possession of the facts. 
Which, btw, is the problem with this whole thread.  When everyone gets all 
the information AND their medical licenses, y'all let me know and then, and 
only then, will I be interested.  In the mean time, the majority of it is 
gossip and a large % of this thread has been mean spirited and nasty gossip!

Lynda
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lynn Wigglesworth" <lynnw1366 AT hotmail.com>


> The doctor thought it was necessary to induce labor, even though it was a
> month before the baby was due. I guess the doctor thought it was a big 
> deal.