homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
- From: bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
- To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Well, maybe it should be attacked from both sides. Everything you said was
right. It's a big game. You have to pay accountants and lawyers to help you
pay the revenuers money. I simply think a tax where people could see what
they are giving the gov't would be better.
But, how are you going to tyell them to stop spending. They are still paying
farmers to make ethanol, when we don't need it. They will probably still be
paying farmers to make ethaniol when your grandson is as old as you. They
never stop. That is 'one' thing I'll give McCain credit for. He's been
raising cain about wasteful spending for years. He never brought 'pork' home
to us.
You are right. But, read the NYT or Wash Post front pages from tonight.
They are already promising hundreds of billions more -- after the bail-out.
Congress is like that sailor in a wh*re house you talked about the other day.
One day a billion chinamen are going to want tyheir d*mn money. And, I
don't blame them. But, we won't be able to pay ......bobf
_________________________________________________________________________
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, Don Bowen <don.bowen AT earthlink.net> wrote:
> From: Don Bowen <don.bowen AT earthlink.net>
> Subject: RE: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective
> To: bobford79 AT yahoo.com, homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 8:14 PM
> > >From what month and year was that written. We have
> the highest corporate
> > taxes in the industrialized world, and the dems want
> to take us back to
> > some of the highest capital gains taxes in the world..
>
> We have the highest base rate but more deductions so the
> real rate of
> corporate taxes is about with the rest of the world. Why
> do you think those
> lobbyists are so well paid.
>
> Besides as I said before, don't talk about taxes, talk
> about spending. What
> do you want to see cut. How about stopping the portion of
> the war on drugs
> that is for marijuana? How about telling the military no
> more new weapons
> until they can prove the existing ones work as deigned?
> How about getting
> rid of the Export Import bank? Why are we giving the auto
> industry money to
> build something they should already be building? The list
> goes on but it is
> too easy to take the intellectually lazy route and just say
> "Taxes are too
> high."
>
> Don Bowen KI6DIU
> http://www.braingarage.com/Dons/Travels/journal/Journal.html
-
[Homestead] Tax burden perspective,
Gene GeRue, 10/29/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective,
bob ford, 10/29/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective,
Don Bowen, 10/29/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective, bob ford, 10/29/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective,
EarthNSky, 10/29/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective,
Lynda, 10/30/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective, EarthNSky, 10/30/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective,
Lynda, 10/30/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective, Lynda, 10/30/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective, Gene GeRue, 10/30/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective,
Don Bowen, 10/29/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective,
Clansgian, 10/31/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective, Gene GeRue, 10/31/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Tax burden perspective,
bob ford, 10/29/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.