homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
- From: bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
- To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 00:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Wow; Maybe there are some people starting to feel anger . Good. And, good
for you, Akka. Incidentally, the gentiles didn't mind a bit using the jewish
holiday as an excuse to campaign.
I don't know how to describe my feelings for the congress without run-on
swear words., none should be re-elected; but 90% will; Because they all
gimme to one group or the other. Dems gimme money to certain groups; repubs
gimme allegiance to certain social constructs. All the reptilian banker
wizards laugh at our collective stupidity. ...bobford
--- On Tue, 9/30/08, Akka Homestead <akkabhomestead AT yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Akka Homestead <akkabhomestead AT yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?
> To: "Homestead List" <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 11:08 PM
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Gene GeRue
> <genegerue AT ruralize.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Or is this not an emergency?
> >
> > Who really knows? Pick your economist.
>
> It is a 'kinda' emergency. it is kinda important,
> but not important
> enough for the Jews and those aids who work for them to be
> there. It is
> kinda important, but not so important that Obama can't
> call and check
> in, It is kind of important, but you know those Republicans
> have to head
> home to campaign. Shoot, I'm freaking surprised that
> Bush and Paulson
> aren't in Crawford. Ol' Dick Cheney, he lay
> low..probably out duck
> hunting or something.
>
> After listening to the news most of the last two days, I
> have a new
> theory...Democrats, just cover your eyes and skip this..
>
> I think Pelosi planned the whole thing. I think the woman
> is evil. Go
> back and look at her promises of two years ago. She's
> third in line no
> matter who wins, and I think that is the scariest option
> yet. Anyway, I
> think she knew that Bush and
> Paulson's plan was unpassable and stupid from the get
> go. However,
> Pelosi and the crew played a magnificent fake...saying we
> will amend and
> work diligently on it...knowing all the while that the bill
> sucked and
> that it would never pass by either Dems or Republicans..so
> anyway, they
> go through the motions, and Ol' Obama, he lay low. He
> calls in to check
> on progress and allegedly interject ideas. McCain takes
> Bush seriously
> and falls for the fake, canceling the campaign and heading
> to DC to work
> on the deal.
> Of course, it doesn't fly. Pelosi gets up and gives
> this sickening
> story of how the Dems worked diligently under Presidential
> directive,
> but the Reps played partisan politics. Before the day was
> out, there
> were 'threats' that they would write their own bill
> that totally favored
> the Democrats and push it through. I believe that will
> happen.
> They could not do such a thing first because they had to
> make a grand
> show of bipartisanship. Also, they needed to keep Obama
> out of the fray
> and let McCain hang himself as he fell for the whole
> leadership ruse.
> Now, the Dems will make a new bill, ram it through, and
> then Obamaman
> will step forward as the hero who finally saved the economy
> with a deal.
> I think it has been planned like that all along. The
> holiday break was
> just a convenient time off to allow the Republicans to stew
> in it. The
> stock market yesterday was just to test the waters and
> basically bring a
> needed correction...give everyone a scare, so that O-man
> becomes even
> more of a Messiah even before election day.
>
> It is such a great scam to cover the fact that the
> Democrats and Obama's
> advisors are in this up to their neck. In 2004,
> Republicans, including
> McCain, warned of this crisis, but Democrats insisted that
> Fannie and
> Freddie were safe and sound. Even Bill Clinton is now
> saying that the
> Democrats were grossly negligent at best, and fraudulent at
> worst. Why
> would it be fraud??? Because high ranking Democrats were
> taking big
> money from Fannie and Freddie employees. They did not
> want more
> regulation, more oversight, because they were on the money
> train.
>
> Speaking of economists, does it bother any of you who are
> Obama
> supporters that the crooked freakin' CEO's of
> Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
> are acting as economic advisors for Obama?
> I add those guys to the list of Obama's questionable
> friends..
> I keep hearing that he will have great judgment, but if his
> choice of
> friends and advisors is indicative of what future choices
> he will make,
> then I am scared.
>
>
> FAIRNESS AND TRUTH IN POLITICS: THE TOP 10 RECIPIENTS OF
> CAMPAIGN
> CONTRIBUTIONS FROM FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC
>
> 1. Dodd, Christopher J. Senate D-CT $133,900
> 2. Kerry, John. Senate D-MA $111,000
> 3. Obama, Barack. Senate D-IL $105,849
> 4. Clinton, Hillary. Senate D-NY $75,550
> 5. Kanjorski, Paul E. House D-PA $65,500
> 6. Bennett, Robert F. Senate R-UT $61,499
> 7. Johnson, Tim. Senate D-SD $61,000
> 8. Conrad, Kent. Senate D-ND $58,991
> 9. Davis, Tom. House R-VA $55,499
> 10. Bond, Christopher S ‘Kit’ Senate R-MO [...]
> 11. Bachus, Spencer. House R-AL $55,300
> 12. Shelby, Richard C. Senate R-AL $55,000
> 13. Emanuel, Rahm. House D-IL $51,750
> 14. Reed, Jack. Senate D-RI $50,750
> 15. Carper, Tom. Senate D-DE $44,389
> 16. Frank, Barney. House D-MA $40,100
> 17. Maloney, Carolyn B. House D-NY $38,750
> 18. Bean, Melissa. House D-IL $37,249
> 19. Blunt, Roy. House R-MO $36,500
> 20. Pryce, Deborah. House R-OH $34,750
> 21. Miller, Gary. House R-CA $33,000
> 22. Pelosi, Nancy. House D-CA $32,750
> 23. Reynolds, Tom. House R-NY $32,700
> 24. Hoyer, Steny H. House D-MD $30,500
> 25. Hooley, Darlene. House D-OR $28,750
>
> 2/3's of the above are Democrats...
> In the Romper Room magic mirror, I see, Nancy and Barney
> and John and
> Christopher, and oh yeah Barry, ..Barry! Barny, stop
> that! Barry, ,that is my mirror,
> stop looking at yourself and give it back this
> second...<g> Nancy, put the knives down...<g>
> McCain isn't on the list, he was out blowing the
> warning horn, trying to
> channel Ronald Reagan. Actually, if you close your eyes
> and listen to the
> guy, it is very freaky how much he sounds like Reagan!
>
> Akka B
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homestead list and subscription:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
> Change your homestead list member options:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/bobford79%40yahoo.com
> View the archives at:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
bob ford, 10/01/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Lynda, 10/01/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
Akka Homestead, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, bob ford, 10/01/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
Lynda, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Marie McHarry, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Marie McHarry, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Lynn Wigglesworth, 10/01/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
Gene GeRue, 10/01/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
Lisa K.V. Perry, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Akka Homestead, 10/01/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
Lisa K.V. Perry, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Lynn Wigglesworth, 10/01/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
Lynn Wigglesworth, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Marie McHarry, 10/01/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.