homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
- From: Akka Homestead <akkabhomestead AT yahoo.com>
- To: Homestead List <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Gene GeRue <genegerue AT ruralize.com>
> wrote:
>> Or is this not an emergency?
>
> Who really knows? Pick your economist.
It is a 'kinda' emergency. it is kinda important, but not important
enough for the Jews and those aids who work for them to be there. It is
kinda important, but not so important that Obama can't call and check
in, It is kind of important, but you know those Republicans have to head
home to campaign. Shoot, I'm freaking surprised that Bush and Paulson
aren't in Crawford. Ol' Dick Cheney, he lay low..probably out duck
hunting or something.
After listening to the news most of the last two days, I have a new
theory...Democrats, just cover your eyes and skip this..
I think Pelosi planned the whole thing. I think the woman is evil. Go
back and look at her promises of two years ago. She's third in line no
matter who wins, and I think that is the scariest option yet. Anyway, I
think she knew that Bush and
Paulson's plan was unpassable and stupid from the get go. However,
Pelosi and the crew played a magnificent fake...saying we will amend and
work diligently on it...knowing all the while that the bill sucked and
that it would never pass by either Dems or Republicans..so anyway, they
go through the motions, and Ol' Obama, he lay low. He calls in to check
on progress and allegedly interject ideas. McCain takes Bush seriously
and falls for the fake, canceling the campaign and heading to DC to work
on the deal.
Of course, it doesn't fly. Pelosi gets up and gives this sickening
story of how the Dems worked diligently under Presidential directive,
but the Reps played partisan politics. Before the day was out, there
were 'threats' that they would write their own bill that totally favored
the Democrats and push it through. I believe that will happen.
They could not do such a thing first because they had to make a grand
show of bipartisanship. Also, they needed to keep Obama out of the fray
and let McCain hang himself as he fell for the whole leadership ruse.
Now, the Dems will make a new bill, ram it through, and then Obamaman
will step forward as the hero who finally saved the economy with a deal.
I think it has been planned like that all along. The holiday break was
just a convenient time off to allow the Republicans to stew in it. The
stock market yesterday was just to test the waters and basically bring a
needed correction...give everyone a scare, so that O-man becomes even
more of a Messiah even before election day.
It is such a great scam to cover the fact that the Democrats and Obama's
advisors are in this up to their neck. In 2004, Republicans, including
McCain, warned of this crisis, but Democrats insisted that Fannie and
Freddie were safe and sound. Even Bill Clinton is now saying that the
Democrats were grossly negligent at best, and fraudulent at worst. Why
would it be fraud??? Because high ranking Democrats were taking big
money from Fannie and Freddie employees. They did not want more
regulation, more oversight, because they were on the money train.
Speaking of economists, does it bother any of you who are Obama
supporters that the crooked freakin' CEO's of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
are acting as economic advisors for Obama?
I add those guys to the list of Obama's questionable friends..
I keep hearing that he will have great judgment, but if his choice of
friends and advisors is indicative of what future choices he will make,
then I am scared.
FAIRNESS AND TRUTH IN POLITICS: THE TOP 10 RECIPIENTS OF CAMPAIGN
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC
1. Dodd, Christopher J. Senate D-CT $133,900
2. Kerry, John. Senate D-MA $111,000
3. Obama, Barack. Senate D-IL $105,849
4. Clinton, Hillary. Senate D-NY $75,550
5. Kanjorski, Paul E. House D-PA $65,500
6. Bennett, Robert F. Senate R-UT $61,499
7. Johnson, Tim. Senate D-SD $61,000
8. Conrad, Kent. Senate D-ND $58,991
9. Davis, Tom. House R-VA $55,499
10. Bond, Christopher S ‘Kit’ Senate R-MO [...]
11. Bachus, Spencer. House R-AL $55,300
12. Shelby, Richard C. Senate R-AL $55,000
13. Emanuel, Rahm. House D-IL $51,750
14. Reed, Jack. Senate D-RI $50,750
15. Carper, Tom. Senate D-DE $44,389
16. Frank, Barney. House D-MA $40,100
17. Maloney, Carolyn B. House D-NY $38,750
18. Bean, Melissa. House D-IL $37,249
19. Blunt, Roy. House R-MO $36,500
20. Pryce, Deborah. House R-OH $34,750
21. Miller, Gary. House R-CA $33,000
22. Pelosi, Nancy. House D-CA $32,750
23. Reynolds, Tom. House R-NY $32,700
24. Hoyer, Steny H. House D-MD $30,500
25. Hooley, Darlene. House D-OR $28,750
2/3's of the above are Democrats...
In the Romper Room magic mirror, I see, Nancy and Barney and John and
Christopher, and oh yeah Barry, ..Barry! Barny, stop that! Barry, ,that is
my mirror,
stop looking at yourself and give it back this second...<g> Nancy, put the
knives down...<g>
McCain isn't on the list, he was out blowing the warning horn, trying to
channel Ronald Reagan. Actually, if you close your eyes and listen to the
guy, it is very freaky how much he sounds like Reagan!
Akka B
>From bobford79 AT yahoo.com Wed Oct 1 03:40:07 2008
Return-Path: <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
id 52A534C329; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 03:17:21 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
version=3.2.3
Received: from web53911.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web53911.mail.re2.yahoo.com
[206.190.38.160])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B6494CB5E
for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:52:31 -0400
(EDT)
Received: (qmail 90824 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Oct 2008 06:52:30 -0000
X-YMail-OSG:
tYGMZ9UVM1l7iaZzu.PrC8YTRZ4WqMQe3XS.NCxWOAncYnXeCaMyJFYFCbdp9BC.rCmHvpLizMjiwEN8sv5M.WGjnIYa6g8f3Eisg5YcfQd4AEmSaKf1.8HENZWNeATiLg2FkxRdKWDJd7.rWAK8bQYMApQ.t5iIiXFROlFz1qaBojVteQ--
Received: from [68.227.240.219] by web53911.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:52:30 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
In-Reply-To: <01ee01c9238f$c847bd50$9a8c9643@Moon>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <368150.90786.qm AT web53911.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?
X-BeenThere: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bobford79 AT yahoo.com, homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
List-Id: <homestead.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
<mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead>
List-Post: <mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
<mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:40:07 -0000
> manipulation of the American public? Maybe that dingy
> author on Mared
> Logic's show is right after all.
Who was the author and who is mared logic (google shows nothing)??
--- On Wed, 10/1/08, Lynda <lurine AT softcom.net> wrote:
> From: Lynda <lurine AT softcom.net>
> Subject: Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?
> To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008, 12:21 AM
> O.K.., so far the banks have bought out the troubled banks
> or the government
> has done bailouts already (Freddy/Fanny).
>
> Are we the only folks who saw the guy interviewed today
> about the proposed
> $$ amount? When asked how they came up with that $$ amount
> his answer was
> "we just picked a large number."
>
> So, if they have nothing to substantiate the amount of
> money they are asking
> for, then is there even a real need for money or is it all
> just more
> manipulation of the American public? Maybe that dingy
> author on Mared
> Logic's show is right after all. Maybe the
> "disasters" are simply
> manufactured inorder to put money in the pockets of certain
> people!
>
> And why in the H*** isn't his interview making the
> news? Why aren't all the
> talking heads screaming about this?
>
> Lynda
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gene GeRue" <genegerue AT ruralize.com>
> To: "Homestead"
> <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:35 PM
> Subject: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?
>
>
> I can't get a handle on the seriousness of the
> so-called financial
> crisis. There is simply too much conflicting information.
>
> "Both campaigns pledged to support efforts to resolve
> the situation,
> though they were short on details. Mr. McCainβs campaign
> said he would
> continue to monitor developments closely to see whether
> more House
> Republicans could now be persuaded to vote for the bill, or
> whether it
> had to be amended to address their concerns. But his aides
> said there
> did not appear to be a need to return to Washington
> immediately, since
> Congress had recessed for Rosh Hashana."
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/us/politics/30campaign.html?ref=us
>
> So, McCain is continuing his campaign. It is no longer of
> highest
> priority. It is not so serious that Congress is working
> straight
> through on it, like eighteen hours a day. They are taking
> time off for
> a religious holiday. Apparently that is more serious than
> the crisis.
> I didn't know what Rosh Hashana was but figured, whoa,
> this must be
> some big deal, so I checked Wikipedia.
>
> It turns out that Rosh Hashanah is the Jewish New Year.
> They blow a
> ram's horn and do other solemn things. Also:
>
> "Rosh Hashanah is a day of rest (Leviticus 23:24):
> with some
> variations, the activities prohibited on Shabbat are also
> prohibited
> on all major Jewish holidays, including Rosh
> Hashanah."
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosh_Hashana
>
> So, in the midst of what we are chillingly told is the
> greatest
> economic disaster of our time, our elected officials are
> observing a
> religious holiday and taking a day of rest.
>
> I thought we had separation of church and state.
>
> What am I missing?
> _______________________________________________
> Homestead list and subscription:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
> Change your homestead list member options:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/lurine%40softcom.net
> View the archives at:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1697 - Release
> Date: 9/29/2008
> 7:40 AM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homestead list and subscription:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
> Change your homestead list member options:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/bobford79%40yahoo.com
> View the archives at:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
bob ford, 10/01/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Lynda, 10/01/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
Akka Homestead, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, bob ford, 10/01/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
Lynda, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Marie McHarry, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Marie McHarry, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Lynn Wigglesworth, 10/01/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
Gene GeRue, 10/01/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
Lisa K.V. Perry, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Akka Homestead, 10/01/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?,
Lisa K.V. Perry, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Lynn Wigglesworth, 10/01/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?, Lynn Wigglesworth, 10/01/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.