Homestead mailing list

[rayzentz AT aim.com]

personally, I don't mind allowing nut-jobs the opportunity to rave.   I 
object to being forced to pay for the platform where they do.   
However, if the US is actually 7 1/2 years in arrears, well, that 
bothers me less.   Hosting is one thing.   Paying for it all is quite 
another.

Ray






-----Original Message-----
From: Marie McHarry <mmcharry AT gmail.com>
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 7:32 pm
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Problem uncovered by foreign leader



I was under the impression that leaders of sovereign countries could
address the UN freely. The US is just the host of the UN; we don't run
the show.

Or maybe sovereign isn't what it used to be?

Marie

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Gene GeRue <genegerue AT ruralize.com> 
wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:18 PM, bob ford wrote:
>
> > No.  What's the matter, Gene?   You should know that there is a
> > difference between our Constitutional right of free speech and a
> > supposed august entity giving prominent platform to a racist ant-
> > semite.
>
> No, Bob, I am unaware of the constitutional mandate against people
> giving a speech in the UN unless it meets certain guidelines. Please
> point out to me where I can read that.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Homestead list and subscription:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
> Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/mmcharry%40gmail.com
> View the archives at:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
_______________________________________________
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/rayzentz%40aim.com
View the archives at:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead