homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
- From: william Eggers <wce1482 AT yahoo.com>
- To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F
- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
No. The Fed can print money, but what the government spends can not be
authorized by any other inity. It is specified in the Constitution.
--- On Sat, 9/13/08, bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com> wrote:
From: bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 1:34 PM
When congress abrogated its constitutional authority to produce currency and
made the federal reserve the de facto constitutionally empowered central bank,
didn't that issue become resolved? .....bobford
----- Original Message ----
From: william Eggers <wce1482 AT yahoo.com>
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:23:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F
What everyone seems to forget about this bailout, is that it is not legal.
The constitution states that all moneys spent by the government must be
authorized by congress and this money was not so authorized.
_______________________________________________
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/wce1482%40yahoo.com
View the archives at:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
>From bobford79 AT yahoo.com Sat Sep 13 16:07:35 2008
Return-Path: <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
id BB0D84C016; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:07:35 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
version=3.2.3
Received: from web53909.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web53909.mail.re2.yahoo.com
[206.190.36.219])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3739C4C018
for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:07:35 -0400
(EDT)
Received: (qmail 41205 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Sep 2008 20:07:35 -0000
X-YMail-OSG:
uR6Cq_oVM1nu6_fPd_lgR.pg_GlK5X9CX9ys32nVcRxuNVnUkpu4zDaBqIm49zkouQ--
Received: from [68.227.240.219] by web53909.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:07:34 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1096.28 YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <970856.40568.qm AT web53909.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F
X-BeenThere: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
List-Id: <homestead.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
<mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead>
List-Post: <mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
<mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 20:07:35 -0000
So , if the elected officials are committing felonies by disregarding their
constitutional oaths, and the appointed officials, beauracrats and CEOs,
CFOs, and others are "unconstitutionally" and feloniously stealing our money,
why is no-one concerned? Why is no one on their way to indictment and prison?
That's part of the question in my original
intent.......................bobford
----- Original Message ----
From: william Eggers <wce1482 AT yahoo.com>
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:57:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F
No. The Fed can print money, but what the government spends can not be
authorized by any other inity. It is specified in the Constitution.
--- On Sat, 9/13/08, bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com> wrote:
From: bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 1:34 PM
When congress abrogated its constitutional authority to produce currency and
made the federal reserve the de facto constitutionally empowered central bank,
didn't that issue become resolved? .....bobford
----- Original Message ----
From: william Eggers <wce1482 AT yahoo.com>
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:23:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F
What everyone seems to forget about this bailout, is that it is not legal.
The constitution states that all moneys spent by the government must be
authorized by congress and this money was not so authorized.
_______________________________________________
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/wce1482%40yahoo.com
View the archives at:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/homestead
_______________________________________________
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/bobford79%40yahoo.com
View the archives at:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/homestead
-
Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F
, (continued)
- Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F, william Eggers, 09/13/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F, DSanner106, 09/08/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F,
Clansgian, 09/08/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F,
Lisa K.V. Perry, 09/08/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F, Gene GeRue, 09/08/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F,
Lisa K.V. Perry, 09/08/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F,
DSanner106, 09/08/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F, Lisa K.V. Perry, 09/08/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F, Don Bowen, 09/08/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F, DSanner106, 09/08/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F, Clansgian, 09/08/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F, william Eggers, 09/13/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F, Clansgian, 09/13/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F,
Clansgian, 09/13/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F, Rob, 09/13/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Another take on F&F, bob ford, 09/14/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.