Homestead mailing list

[DSanner106 AT aol.com]

So you would rather just give them the money with no possibility of  
recovery????   I would rather have
some hope anyway.  Look at previous govt. bailouts, like Chrysler many  years 
ago. The stock was around 2.00 a share, and after recovery was at 32.00 a  
share. Had the Govt. taken stock for their cash infusion, we would not have 
lost 
 a cent and would have made money while saving a bunch of jobs in the 
process.  This seems like a much better idea. .
 
D
 
 
In a message dated 9/8/2008 11:18:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
lisakvperry AT gmail.com writes:

>  > >They will have stock they can sell and recover the investment  from
> later.
>
> They have stock that borders on worthless  that they can pretend they can
> sell
> later.  If the stock  had been worth anything, there would have been no need
> for the take  over.   





**************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, 
plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com.      
(http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)