Homestead mailing list

["Toni Hawryluk" <tonihawr AT msn.com>]

> So, my question is HOW do you "modernize" something without "changing" it?  
> Lynda

"First, Kill all the liars ...."
>From tonihawr AT msn.com  Fri Nov  5 14:15:02 2004
Return-Path: <tonihawr AT msn.com>
X-Original-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from hotmail.com (bay4-dav29.bay4.hotmail.com [65.54.171.59])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611384C005
        for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri,  5 Nov 2004 14:15:02 -0500 
(EST)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
        Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:15:00 -0800
Received: from 65.54.97.140 by BAY4-DAV29.phx.gbl with DAV;
        Fri, 05 Nov 2004 19:14:43 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [65.54.97.140]
X-Originating-Email: [tonihawr AT msn.com]
X-Sender: tonihawr AT msn.com
From: "Toni Hawryluk" <tonihawr AT msn.com>
To: "Homestead mailing list" <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:05:42 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: MSN 9
X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.10.0009.2900
Seal-Send-Time: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:05:42 -0800
Message-ID: <BAY4-DAV29jWOiy54Dg0000abe4 AT hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Nov 2004 19:15:00.0959 (UTC)
        FILETIME=[BF2DE6F0:01C4C36B]
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Subject: [Homestead] thief steals again
X-BeenThere: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
List-Id: homestead.lists.ibiblio.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead>
List-Post: <mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 19:15:02 -0000

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/APWires/headlines/D865R1DO0.html<http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/APWires/headlines/D865R1DO0.html>

 

Machine error gives Bush extra Ohio votes 

COLUMBUS, Ohio - An error with an electronic voting system gave President 
Bush 3,893 extra votes in suburban Columbus, elections officials said.

Franklin County's unofficial results had Bush receiving 4,258 votes to 
Democrat John Kerry's 260 votes in a precinct in Gahanna. Records show only 
638 voters cast ballots in that precinct.

Bush actually received 365 votes in the precinct, Matthew Damschroder, 
director of the Franklin County Board of Elections, told The Columbus 
Dispatch.

State and county election officials did not immediately respond to requests 
by The Associated Press for more details about the voting system and its 
vendor, and whether the error, if repeated elsewhere in Ohio, could have 
affected the outcome.

Bush won the state by more than 136,000 votes, according to unofficial 
results, and Kerry conceded the election on Wednesday after acknowledging 
that 155,000 provisional ballots yet to be counted in Ohio would not change 
the result.

The Secretary of State's Office said Friday it could not revise Bush's total 
until the county reported the error.

The Ohio glitch is among a handful of computer troubles that have emerged 
since Tuesday's elections.

In one North Carolina county, more than 4,500 votes were lost because 
officials mistakenly believed a computer that stored ballots electronically 
could hold more data than it did. And in San Francisco, a malfunction with 
custom voting software could delay efforts to declare the winners of four 
races for county supervisor.

In the Ohio precinct in question, the votes are recorded onto a cartridge. On 
one of the three machines at that precinct, a malfunction occurred in the 
recording process, Damschroder said. He could not explain how the malfunction 
occurred.

Damschroder said people who had seen poll results on the election board's Web 
site called to point out the discrepancy. The error would have been 
discovered when the official count for the election is performed later this 
month, he said.

The reader also recorded zero votes in a county commissioner race on the 
machine.

Workers checked the cartridge against memory banks in the voting machine and 
each showed that 115 people voted for Bush on that machine. With the other 
machines, the total for Bush in the precinct added up to 365 votes.

Meanwhile, in San Francisco, a glitch occurred with software designed for the 
city's new "ranked-choice voting," in which voters list their top three 
choices for municipal offices. If no candidate gets a majority of first-place 
votes outright, voters' second and third-place preferences are then 
distributed among candidates who weren't eliminated in the first round.

When the San Francisco Department of Elections tried a test run on Wednesday 
of the program that does the redistribution, some of the votes didn't get 
counted and skewed the results, director John Arntz said.

"All the information is there," Arntz said. "It's just not arriving the way 
it was supposed to."

A technician from the Omaha, Neb. company that designed the software, 
Election Systems & Software Inc., was working to diagnose and fix the problem.