FreeTDS Development Group

[David Owen <dowen AT midsomer.org>]

What ASE on Linux server are you on Gad (sorry, forgotten).  Michaels
suggestions are sound and will make a huge difference.  Async IO might
be another biggie.  Has any other tweaking been done to either the NT or
the Linux boxes?

Actually, although I don't think that he is on this list, but Wim ten
Have (who ported ASE to Linux) reads the ASE Linux list.  If there is a
serious problem he is certain to want to know about it.  I too have lost
track of the thread, so again cannot remember.  Are we saying that the
performance decrease is independent of which set of libraries are used? 
If I am muddying already dirty waters, sorry.

dowen


On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 08:59, Michael Peppler wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 04:09, Gad Hayisraeli wrote:
> > i think i caused some misunderstood:
> > the LPS test for both ASE linux and windows was based on freetds client, 
> > with 2048 packet size. but the maximum write
> > speed of the linux server was 36 lps, while the windows was 200 lps.
> > 
> > so i think its a server problem in the linux developer edition (the ASE 
> > that i installed)
> > 
> > someone has a clue why ?
> 
> dsync on the disk devices
> default data cache too small
> 
> These two will make a lot of difference...
> 
> Michael
> -- 
> Michael Peppler                              Data Migrations, Inc.
> mpeppler AT peppler.org                 http://www.mbay.net/~mpeppler
> Sybase T-SQL/OpenClient/OpenServer/C/Perl developer available for short or 
> long term contract positions - http://www.mbay.net/~mpeppler/resume.html
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
> 
-- 
David Owen     Midsomer Consultants Inc.      dowen AT midsomer.org
Maintainer of the Sybase FAQ: http://www.isug.com/Sybase_FAQ