freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Peter Harvey <pharvey AT codebydesign.com>
- To: freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 13:46:35 -0800
Hmm. Maybe I should write something up for the www site, under
"Entertainment" or something, called "ODBC Considered Harmful". It would
save us both time, eh? :-)
I think there are too many people who comment negatively about ODBC with out really knowing enough about it.
Its not;
- for non-tabular data (some not-ported MS standards handle this)
- the fastest method to access data (use your db API for that)
Its good (or even great) at;
- providing a portable API (cross-database and cross-platform)
- leveraging an existing standard (arguably the most commomly used standard for accessing relational data)
- optionaly providing version mapping and driver plugabiliy via a driver manager
The main problem with ODBC for most people comes from poor drivers not from the ODBC standard itself.
Having said this I am VERY happy to see continued improvement of the FreeTDS ODBC driver and if someone decides to create the an OLE-DB compat. sub-system for Linux/UNIX then great. But lets not trample all over ODBC. :)
My fave thing about UNIX is how it leverages past work and is mostly based upon great standards. I dislike the way MS completely replaces "standard" after "standard".
Now if only there was a real effort to refine/improve the ODBC standard perhaps then more people would be happy with it and we can do a little less reinventing the wheel and a little more bullet-proofing.
Peter
-
[freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
Craft, Steve, 02/06/2003
- RE: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?, Daniel Morgan, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
James K. Lowden, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
Jon Pounder, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
James K. Lowden, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
Peter Harvey, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
christopher baus, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
Jon Pounder, 02/06/2003
- Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?, christopher baus, 02/06/2003
- Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?, Jon Pounder, 02/06/2003
- Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?, christopher baus, 02/06/2003
- Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?, Jon Pounder, 02/06/2003
- Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?, Mark J. Lilback, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
Jon Pounder, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
christopher baus, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
Peter Harvey, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
James K. Lowden, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
Jon Pounder, 02/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?,
James K. Lowden, 02/06/2003
- Re: [freetds] Win32 - ODBC Not OLEDB ?, Peter Harvey, 02/06/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.