Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Lowden, James K" <LowdenJK AT bernstein.com>
  • To: "'TDS Development Group'" <freetds AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
  • Subject: RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1
  • Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 16:17:54 -0400


> From: Frediano Ziglio [mailto:freddyz77 AT tin.it]
> Sent: September 10, 2002 3:10 PM
>
> > "make dist" on my machine, even ensuring I'm using Gnu
> make, creates a
> > tarball whose src/odbc directory is empty except for a
> unittests directory
> > and a zero-length Makefile.
> >
>
> Fixed, now odbc dir is always distributed...
>
> Added dbopen.c too.

Frediano,

My goodness! Does the sun never set in Italy this time of year? ;)

OK, I see your changes. I'm trying to adjust the tags and build a working
distribution. It looks like my retag list should be:

Makefile.am
configure.in
freetds.spec.in
doc/Makefile.am
src/Makefile.am #done, now 1.4
src/dblib/Makefile.am

Whew!

I'd rather do this right than steal the snapshot. It looks like we have
enough autotool knowledge.

I'm going to put another 60 minutes into this, then it's going to sit for 12
hours. I'm taking the day off tomorrow (September 11), and will start my
release engineering ~12:00 UTC. I think between us, we'll get this nailed
down.

To anyone listening, wondering what the heck is going on: We're admitting no
code changes, not touching any .h or .c files. We're adjusting the build
environment such that the distribution tarball is correct, such that it
requires the minimum toolset possible to build.

Brian, src/Makefile.am had to be changed to make "make dist" always include
odbc. What does the overnight snapshot do that "make dist" doesn't? Is
there a good reason for it? I guess it's time I understood this better,
being Chief Release Engineer and all.

> My FreeBSD seem to not have problems (beside openjade not
> installed and perhaps in different directory)...

Yes, it's pretty clear that NetBSD was not the issue.

Regards,

--jkl


The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s)
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any
review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message. Please note that for certain accounts we do not accept
orders and/or instructions by e-mail, and for those accounts we will not be
responsible for carrying out such orders and/or instructions. Kindly refrain
from sending orders or instructions by e-mail unless you have confirmed that
we accept such communications for your account. Please also note that to
satisfy regulatory requirements we review the outgoing and incoming e-mail
correspondence of staff members serving certain functions.






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page