freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Frediano Ziglio <freddyz77 AT tin.it>
- To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1
- Date: 10 Sep 2002 21:06:12 +0200
Il mar, 2002-09-10 alle 18:16, Brian Bruns ha scritto:
> > It work (it compile) but contain some unneeded file (like CVS one)
> > Should these file go to distribution:
> > - autogen.sh
> > - INSTALL.CVS
> > - doc/CodingStyle
> > - doc/developer
> > - doc/README.releasing
> > ??
> > IMHO no...
>
> It is a source code release, I think CodingStyle makes sense. If you want
> to make a local bug fix or platform specific change, I don't think it's
> fair to require CVS, so autogen.sh probably belongs too. The others,
> probably don't matter much, as long as they stay in the source tree and
> aren't installed to, say /usr/local/share/doc or whatever.
>
Added CodingStyle and autogen to automake dist stuff...
> > > Can you build an rpm from it?
> > >
> >
Added spec file, modified to include in autoconf generation and
distribution.
> > No, rpm must find a .spec file inside tarball. It work in such way
> > - rpm extract spec from dist
> > - rpm build extracted spec
>
> I build the rpm by putting the spec in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS and my
> tarballs in ../SOURCES and build with 'rpm -ba', so it is very possible.
>
Now, rpm -ta distro work a well.
> Perhaps a 'make rpm' target with spec files in the tarball makes sense in
> the future, but let's leave any big items like this to 0.61 at this point.
>
> > freddy77
>
> Jim, if we are still having release problems I'd recommend letting me do
> the release from my machine to get this out the door. It's the same as my
> snapshot script, except I pull the tagged version from CVS. Technically,
> last nights -current and rc3 should be identical.
>
> Brian
>
I tried to rebuild distro using my FreeBSD/i386 test machine. It work
with distro. Only problem is it exec gtar (??) instead of tar. Also it
do not build html documentation (because already compiled in distro).
I removed compiled documentation... but I have no openjade installed...
ops.. also I do not have autoconf installed too...
All using make (not gmake) and build correctly...
freddy77
-
RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1
, (continued)
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Brian Bruns, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Lowden, James K, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, ZIGLIO Frediano, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Lowden, James K, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, ZIGLIO Frediano, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Lowden, James K, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Brian Bruns, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Lowden, James K, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Lowden, James K, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Brian Bruns, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Frediano Ziglio, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Frediano Ziglio, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Lowden, James K, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Brian Bruns, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, Lowden, James K, 09/10/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, ZIGLIO Frediano, 09/11/2002
- RE: Corrupt file 0.60rc1, James K. Lowden, 09/11/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.