freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Brian Bruns <camber AT ais.org>
- To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: UG clarification
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 06:37:23 -0400 (EDT)
I've got some things I'd like to clean up in it, so the sooner it makes an
appearance in CVS the better I'll be able to get that in before the 0.60
release.
Brian
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, James K. Lowden wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 22:45:05 -0400 (EDT), "Brian Bruns" <camber AT ais.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Excuse me while I resurect this thread. jkl, I went out on your site to
> >
> > look at your work in progress, but I'm getting some errors on certain
> > tags (corpname for one) did you upgrade versions without telling me? ;-)
> > I have:
> >
> > [bdog@blaptop bdog]$ jade -v
> > jade:I: OpenJade version "1.3"
> > jade:I: OpenSP version "1.3.4"
>
> I have:
>
> jade -v
> jade:I: Jade version "1.2.1"
> jade:I: SP version "1.3.4"
>
> which is probably a bit more dated. Do you think that's why your HTML
> output comes out nicer than mine?
>
> It won't build right now, Brian. I've been hacking through, setting tags
> the way I think they should be, and looking at it in text mode (see
> http://www.SchemaMania.org/freetds/cvs/freetds/doc/ug2txt). I figured I'd
> go over it massively, then deal with the technical issues.
>
> The big technical change is the one I threatened :) a while back: to bring
> it up to DocBook 4.2. I haven't updated the DTD spec at the top of the
> document; that's why it won't build. <corpname> and <systemitem
> class="library"> aren't in docbook 3.x.
>
> I want to write a UCS-2 discussion as an appendix. Now that the patches
> are all in (famous last words), I think I just need an evening or two for
> that. That's the last major bit of text. There are a couple of minor
> ones that we still need that I come to mind right away: a manpage for tsql
> and a UG section for locales.
>
> If you'd like me to commit a working (or non-working) version, I can focus
> on the jade issues first. Another way to go about it would be to grab my
> version yourself, update the DTD and fix the technical errors, and commit.
> I could incorporate your updates while I work on the appendix.
>
> Realistically, given my time constraints, I don't expect to be able to
> render HTML before next Friday.
>
> --jkl
>
>
-
Re: UG clarification
, (continued)
- Re: UG clarification, Mark H. Wood, 06/13/2002
- Re: UG clarification, Steve Langasek, 06/13/2002
- Re: UG clarification, Steve Langasek, 06/13/2002
- Re: UG clarification, James K . Lowden, 06/13/2002
- Re: UG clarification, James K . Lowden, 06/13/2002
- Re: UG clarification, James K . Lowden, 06/13/2002
- Re: UG clarification, Steve Langasek, 06/14/2002
- Re: UG clarification, James K . Lowden, 06/16/2002
- Re: UG clarification, Brian Bruns, 06/25/2002
-
Re: UG clarification,
James K . Lowden, 06/25/2002
- Re: UG clarification, Brian Bruns, 06/26/2002
-
Message not available
- Re: UG clarification, James K . Lowden, 06/27/2002
- Re: UG clarification, Lowden, James K, 06/26/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.