freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: James Cameron <cameron AT stl.dec.com>
- To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: GNU auto-stuff
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 13:48:26 +1100
Peter Harvey wrote:
> NOTE: All of the files generated by Makefile.cvs should probably NOT be
> in cvs.
Yes, I've mentioned that. Most other projects avoid putting any such
files into CVS, thus requiring people who use CVS to download the
package to have a current set of tools.
However, this project decided to place the files into CVS because:
- the CVS download method is the most frequently suggested to solve
problems, and
- that answering questions about the versions of the tools required
would be a waste of time.
If this project were a democracy, I'd urge for a vote on which way to
go, and would vote for removal of generated files. But I say this
project is a benevolent dictatorship, and that Brian Bruns is doing
quite an excellent job, and we can easily cope with the complexity of
generated files in CVS at this time. ;-)
In the meanwhile, someone with CVS access has to have the official job
of regenerating configure and so on prior to release. I'm expected that
is Brian.
--
James Cameron (cameron AT stl.dec.com)
http://www.opensource.org/ http://vanilla.us.netrek.org/ http://lwn.net/
-
GNU auto-stuff,
Peter Harvey, 11/08/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: GNU auto-stuff, Steve Langasek, 11/08/2001
- Re: GNU auto-stuff, James Cameron, 11/08/2001
- Re: GNU auto-stuff, Brian Bruns, 11/08/2001
- Re: GNU auto-stuff, Mark J. Lilback, 11/08/2001
- Re: GNU auto-stuff, Mark J. Lilback, 11/08/2001
- Re: GNU auto-stuff, Peter Harvey, 11/08/2001
- Re: GNU auto-stuff, James Cameron, 11/08/2001
- Re: GNU auto-stuff, Steve Langasek, 11/09/2001
- Re: GNU auto-stuff, Steve Langasek, 11/09/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.