freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Brian Bruns <camber AT umcc.ais.org>
- To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 07:55:51 -0400 (EDT)
We've had several people running on Solaris (with some local fixes
apparently). Now the question may be were all the Solaris people running
with 4.2 and this is 5.0? I'm trying to remember but it seems the packet
headers were in a fixed order that did not change which would mean when
sending a packet it should not swap the the length. Theoretically you
should be able to connect to a server with HW_LITTLE_ENDIAN set on a big
endian machine. There might not seem to be much value in it now, but I
haven't seen much in TDS 7.0 that indicates it supports multiple byte
orders.
Brian
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Mark Schaal wrote:
>
> Oww, my brain hurts. Has ANY big-endian machine ever run this? I
> currently believe that as long as the initial capabilities are set
> then the database sends data in the correct byte-order, meaning that
> the bitfiddling in tds_get_smallint() is bogus. However, I changed
> that and it makes things break in a different way that I haven't been
> able to pinpoint. My big fear is that somewhere there's a smallint or
> an int that is byte-order dependent.
>
> Enough for today.
>
> Tally-ho,
>
> Mark
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Michael Peppler wrote:
> >
> > > OK - now on Solaris 7, Sparc...
> > >
> > > I've made sure that HW_BIG_ENDIAN is defined.
> > >
> > > However, I get:
> > >
> > > kiruna (10:33AM):123 > perl -Mblib t/main.t
> > > Using /u6/home/mpeppler/src/Sybase-dist/DBD-Sybase-0.19/blib
> > > 1..12
> > > ok 1
> > > Switch: DBI-1.08 Switch by Tim Bunce, 1.08
> > > Available Drivers: ADO, ExampleP, Proxy, Sybase
> > > Unknown property 7
> > > ok 2
> > > ok 3
> > > ct_describe() failed at t/main.t line 61.
> > > 3805:
> > > Server message number=3805 severity=18 state=1 line=1 text=The token
> > > datastream length was not correct. This is an internal protocol error.
> >
> > urgh, I have no idea on this one...Have any of the other Solaris people
> > tried DBD::Sybase? Offhand, several of the token streams have a size in
> > the first two bytes. Looks like it didn't properly decide which one was
> > the high order byte. Question is: which token caused it? And, if this is a
> > server message, that means we sent it wrong and not the other way around.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > Brian
>
>
> --
> Mark J. Schaal Phone: (909)
> 620-7724
> TST On Ramp Fax: (909) 620-8174
> System Administrator E-Mail: mark AT tstonramp.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to freetds as: camber AT ais.org
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to $subst('Email.Unsub')
>
>
-
Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash
, (continued)
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Michael Peppler, 08/25/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Mark Schaal, 08/25/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Brian Bruns, 08/25/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Michael Peppler, 08/26/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Mark Schaal, 08/26/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Michael Peppler, 08/26/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Michael Peppler, 08/26/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Michael Peppler, 08/26/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Brian Bruns, 08/26/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Mark Schaal, 08/27/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Brian Bruns, 08/28/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Bill Tutt, 08/28/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Brian Bruns, 08/28/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Bill Tutt, 08/29/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Brian Bruns, 08/29/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Brian Bruns, 08/29/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Brian Bruns, 08/30/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Mark Schaal, 08/30/1999
- Re: DBD::Sybase main.t crash, Brian Bruns, 08/30/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.