Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - [Corpus-Paul] ...And From Blood

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "RUSSELL BOOTH" <russbooth281 AT msn.com>
  • To: <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [Corpus-Paul] ...And From Blood
  • Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:49:52 -0500

Blood is prohibited to those under the Noahide Covenant (Gen 9:4) and to
those under the Mosaic Covenant (Lev 3:17, 7:26-27, 17:10-14, Deut
12:16,12:23-27,15:22-23). Saul acted to prevent people from having to suffer
the penalty for having violated this law (1 Sam 14:33-35 ). Did Paul do
something similar?

Paul reported that he was informed of the body and blood elements of the
commemorative meal by a vision of the risen Christ (1 Cor 11:23). He stated
that he did not receive this information from any eye-witness (Gal 1:15-23).
Barring supernatural causes, Paul's testimony allows body and blood elements
of the commemorative meal to be traced to Paul but not to the historical
Jesus.

The author of Luke/Acts depicted Peter, post-crucifixion, as claiming not to
have ever eaten anything unclean (Acts 10:14). Blood is unclean for all
humans according to the customs of Moses. Peter claimed not to have
participated in a meal that included blood.

The Pillars - James, Peter and John - and the elders issued a decree
prohibiting blood to those under the Noahide Covenant (Acts 15:19-20,
21:25). This would prohibit to them the commemorative meal that Paul was
teaching.

After the crucifixion, blood continued to be prohibited to those under both
the Noahide and Mosaic Covenants according to Jesus' direct successor, to
disciples who were with Jesus during his ministry and to their assembly.

Body and blood symbolism associated with the Eucharist cannot be traced to
the historical Jesus through Paul or through the disciples of Jesus using
commonly accepted historical-critical methods. Therefore, body and blood
symbolism associated with the Eucharist originated with Paul.

Theological refutation of this assertion would require simply an apologetic
affirmation of creed.

Setting faith aside, how would one falsify this proposition?

Respectfully,

Russ Booth
russbooth281 AT msn.com
Minneapolis, Minnesota






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page