Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: Musings on Pauline Studies

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Andrew Goddard" <andrew.goddard AT wycliffe-hall.oxford.ac.uk>
  • To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: Musings on Pauline Studies
  • Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:00:04 +0100


Jim, thanks for your response to Loren Rosson.
I take it your publication you refer to is the 1995 NovT article. I wonder
if you (or others who reach your conclusions) have responded at all anywhere
to two subsequent pieces (both 1996 I think) relating to your claims as to
the concern in 1.26 & 27 - (a) Brooten whose lengthy study 'Love Between
Women' I think argues strongly against the heterosexual anal intercourse
reading for women's unnatural sex and in favour of homosexual conduct and
(b) Mark D. Smith's AAR piece on 'Ancient Bisexuality and the Interpretation
of Rmns 1.26-27' which I thought does a fairly good critique of the
Scroggs/pederasty reading. Would be interested to know of engagement with
these pieces from the sort of interepretation you advocate.
Perhaps we need to change the subject on this one if it is going to run to
something like 'Paul & homosexuality' ?

All the best,
Andrew.
***********************
Andrew Goddard,
Wycliffe Hall,
54 Banbury Rd,
Oxford,
OX2 6PW
andrew.goddard AT wycliffe.ox.ac.uk

For information on Sarum College's
Certificate in Politics and Theology, see
www.sarum.ac.uk/society/prospect.htm.






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page