corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: Thomas P Roche <troche AT acsu.buffalo.edu>
- To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Paul and the Gospels
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 00:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
What do we need a 'reasonable alternative' for, sir? The alternative is
that the texts are what they say that they are. How hard is that? I
repeat my objection to the singular criticism methodology employed against
the very much more well attested NT texts, as opposed to all other ancient
G-R texts.
I will be departing this list, which seems a haven for pseudo-scholarly
God=haters.
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Jim West wrote:
> At 01:16 AM 4/5/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >Very simply, let me clarify. People here are regularly citing 'Q', often
> >complete with chapter and verse citations, as though this document did in
> >fact exist, when it manifestly is the construct of scholars. NOw I
> >realize that a small portion of biblical scholars working over a very
> >small period of the history of the christian church, in accordance with
> >thier 'higher critical' presuppostions and theories, have indeed
> >postulated such a document, and spilled large quantities of ink and
> >electrons defending it as though they had copious ancient documentary
> >evidence to back up their speculations. My point, further, should be
> >clear-- I am a classicist/ ancient historian, and I have to say that it is
> >manifestly true that NO other series of ancient Greco-Roman texts has been
> >subjected to anything, anything, like the hypercritical dissections,
> >deconstructions, and reinterpretations, as has the various New Testament
> >books, all the while when it is also manifestly true that the number of
> >ancient mss for the NT and parts thereof simply dwarfs, by several score
> >times, the number of any such mss we possess for any other Greco-Roman
> >texts, most of which are also far younger. Indeed, people read these
> >various texts without a thought to engaging in 'higher criticism' thereof,
> >while waxing intellectual with their hc formulations of the NT texts, and
> >denigrating those of us who do not hold to such flights of fancy. Pooey.
> >
>
> and still none of this demonstrates a reasonable alternative...
>
> best,
>
> jim
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Jim West, ThD
> Petros Baptist Church- Pastor
> Quartz Hill School of Theology- Adjunct Prof. of Bible
>
> fax- 978-231-5986
> email- jwest AT highland.net
> web page- http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to corpus-paul as: troche AT acsu.buffalo.edu
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
>
>
-
Re: Paul and the Gospels
, (continued)
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Micheal Palmer, 04/04/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Jim West, 04/04/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Stevan Davies, 04/04/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Stephen C. Carlson, 04/04/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, David C. Hindley, 04/04/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Thomas P Roche, 04/05/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Licia Kuenning, 04/06/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Jim West, 04/06/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Frank Glenn, 04/06/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, John C. Hurd, 04/06/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Thomas P Roche, 04/07/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.