corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: Frank Glenn <fcg AT cvpc.edu.ph>
- To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Paul and the Gospels
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 10:56:11 +0800
At 01:08 PM 4/5/99 -0400, Licia wrote:
(snip)
>That said, the
>Q hypothesis seems harmless to me provided we don't put more
>weight on it than it will bear. It doesn't seem incompatible
>with a conservative handling of the texts.
Agreed. And it does allow us to analyze the borders of the
hermeneutic wrapped around the contents by the gospel writers. Just as the
Ten Commandments in either Exodus or Deuteronomy deserve their own reading
without J,E,P,&D, the contents of Q deserve a close look standing alone.
Frank
-
Re: Paul and the Gospels
, (continued)
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, yonder moynihan gillihan, 04/03/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, yonder moynihan gillihan, 04/04/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Micheal Palmer, 04/04/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Jim West, 04/04/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Stevan Davies, 04/04/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Stephen C. Carlson, 04/04/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, David C. Hindley, 04/04/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Thomas P Roche, 04/05/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Licia Kuenning, 04/06/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Jim West, 04/06/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Frank Glenn, 04/06/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, John C. Hurd, 04/06/1999
- Re: Paul and the Gospels, Thomas P Roche, 04/07/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.