cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Cc-uk mailing list
List archive
Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons
- From: Cory Doctorow <doctorow AT craphound.com>
- To: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock AT okfn.org>
- Cc: cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 13:14:09 +0100
I think that that was Finland -- it wasn't that they forbade CC licensing, but rather insisted that any distribution, save through the author's website (i.e., not via P2P or other low-cost alternatives to hosting large audio files) would disqualify members from ALL rolayties. They've since abandoned that position (yay!).
WRT colelcting societies in the UK; there's nothing about CC that's inherently inimical to collecting societies. It's true that a CC licensed pool of material would be exempt from royalties in noncommercial contexts. This material doesn't displace revenue -- generally, noncommercial venues are exempt from collecting society fees anyway.
There IS a minority of commercial-use-permitted CC material that might displace some collecting-society material, but that's not a major problem. In most instances, we can imagine that a traditional collecting society venue (say, a pub or a concert hall) takes out its license not because no public domain material will be performed there, but because SOME non-PD material will be played there.
It's conceivable, I suppose, that someone might create a (commercial? noncommercial?) service aggregating CC-licensed material and creating a "radio station" for hairdressers, bars, and other venues that are now subject to a collective license offered for a lower cost than the license, but at that point, the collecting society is in the position of objecting to CC because it creates a competitive market in collective licenses; hardly a sympathetic argument!
On Oct 15, 2004, at 1:04 PM, Rufus Pollock wrote:
Recently someone raised the question of the attitude of collecting societies to Creative Commons. Under (some) CC licenses the collecting society, I believe, will not receive any revenue. Is this correct and if so will collecting societies oppose CC licenses? For example it was said that in Germany the main collecting society had forbidden its members to release CC work (is this true?).
Regards,
Rufus Pollock
_______________________________________________
Cc-uk mailing list
Cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-uk
-
[Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons,
Rufus Pollock, 10/15/2004
- Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons, Cory Doctorow, 10/15/2004
- Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons, Rob Myers, 10/15/2004
- Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons, Javier de la Cueva, 10/15/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons, Bernard Horrocks, 10/15/2004
-
Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons,
archiemaddan, 10/15/2004
- Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons, Bernard Hurley, 10/18/2004
-
[Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons,
Edward Barrow, 10/19/2004
-
RE: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons,
Paul Brindley - MusicAlly, 10/19/2004
-
Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons,
Bernard Hurley, 10/19/2004
-
Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons,
Edward Barrow, 10/19/2004
- Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons, Bernard Hurley, 10/20/2004
-
Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons,
Edward Barrow, 10/19/2004
-
Re: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons,
Bernard Hurley, 10/19/2004
-
RE: [Cc-uk] collecting societies and creative commons,
Paul Brindley - MusicAlly, 10/19/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.