cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC 4.0 Make NC Clause Problems Worse?
- From: Anthony <osm AT inbox.org>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC 4.0 Make NC Clause Problems Worse?
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 08:59:11 -0400
While thinking about this we should keep in mind that the NC licenses
do not ban commercial use. They ban exercising any of the exclusive
rights of the copyright holder "in any manner that is primarily
intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private
monetary compensation".
A key word there is "primarily".
Of course, this to some extent only serves to make the waters more
murky. There is certainly an argument that someone who is printing
and selling books can have an intent which is primarily educational,
and that their purpose in charging a price is to assist in the goal of
educating, rather than vice versa.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:31 AM, David Wiley <david.wiley AT gmail.com> wrote:
> Ben,
>
> For an example of someone who thinks educational use is commercial,
> see the terms of use here:
>
> http://www.montereyinstitute.org/license/license.html
>
> David
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Ben Finney
> <bignose+hates-spam AT benfinney.id.au> wrote:
>> Heather Morrison <hgmorris AT sfu.ca> writes:
>>
>>> I have argued that NC make explicit that educational use is not
>>> considered commercial.
>>
>> When I use CC-BY-SA materials to teach people a programming language
>> (for example), that is definitely educational use.
>>
>> I do so for a fee directly paid for this service; that is definitely
>> commercial use.
>>
>> So I think it's flatly false to say that educational use is not
>> considered commercial. So it's disingenuous to expect people to
>> interpret a Non-Commercial clause this way.
>>
>> Which part of my definition do you disagree with?
>>
>> I don't see how you could agree that I'm making educational use for
>> profit, but somehow say that is “not considered commercial” use. And if
>> you want it to be “not considered commercial” for the purposes of
>> interpreting the CC-NC clause, then I think you're trying to make the
>> terms mean the opposite of what they say.
>>
>> --
>> \ “All my life I've had one dream: to achieve my many goals.” |
>> `\ —Homer, _The Simpsons_ |
>> _o__) |
>> Ben Finney
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> List info and archives at
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
>> Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses
>>
>> In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
>> in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
>> process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
> _______________________________________________
> List info and archives at
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
> Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses
>
> In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
> in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
> process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
-
[cc-licenses] Will CC 4.0 Make NC Clause Problems Worse?,
David Wiley, 05/02/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC 4.0 Make NC Clause Problems Worse?,
Heather Morrison, 05/04/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC 4.0 Make NC Clause Problems Worse?, Anthony, 05/05/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC 4.0 Make NC Clause Problems Worse?,
Ben Finney, 05/08/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC 4.0 Make NC Clause Problems Worse?,
David Wiley, 05/08/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC 4.0 Make NC Clause Problems Worse?,
Anthony, 05/08/2012
-
[cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial,
Heather Morrison, 05/08/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial,
Andrew Rens, 05/08/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial, Heather Morrison, 05/08/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial, David Wiley, 05/08/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial, headphonica free music netlabel, 05/15/2012
- Message not available
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial, Andrew Rens, 05/16/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial, Heather Morrison, 05/16/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial, jonathon, 05/18/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial, Anthony, 05/18/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial, drew Roberts, 05/19/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial,
Andrew Rens, 05/08/2012
-
[cc-licenses] NC Proposal No. 12: clarifying noncommercial,
Heather Morrison, 05/08/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC 4.0 Make NC Clause Problems Worse?,
Anthony, 05/08/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC 4.0 Make NC Clause Problems Worse?,
David Wiley, 05/08/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Will CC 4.0 Make NC Clause Problems Worse?,
Heather Morrison, 05/04/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.