Development of Creative Commons licenses

[<zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:24:03 +0200, Paul Keller <pk AT kl.nl> wrote:
> On 16 Apr 2012, at 14:38, <zotz AT 100jamz.com> <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:57:12 +0100, Rob Myers <rob AT robmyers.org> wrote:
>>> On 04/10/2012 02:19 PM, drew Roberts wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There is no reason why BY or BY-SA should be incompatible either.
>>>
>>> There is because it clashes with how collecting societies operate at the
>>> moment.
>>
>> Right, but this is their choice, not some fundamental law of the
>> universe. There is no reason they could not adapt if they wanted to.
> 
> Well and there are cases where they have started to adapt: BUMA (NL),
> KODA (DK) and SCAEM (FR) have all added the possibility for member to
> use NC licenses. Problem is that most of the other do not need the
> need to do so. The key here is that all of these societies are member
> driven organizations and the request for more flexibility need to come
> from outside. There is very little CC or non members can do about
> this.


Are these groups the legal monopolies for their function in their
countries or could another group be formed in the country to be a
collection society more in line with Free usage and with other
membership?
>
snip
> 
> /paul 

all the best,

drew