cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!
- From: Francesco Poli <invernomuto AT paranoici.org>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:01:34 +0200
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:14:48 -0700 Heather Morrison wrote:
[...]
> May I bring up for argument's sake that it would be optimal if CC-BY
> did NOT grant commercial rights, but that rather this would require
> a special license?
I strongly disagree that it would be optimal.
CC-by would then lose *any* chance of being considered a license
suitable for releasing Free works.
A work cannot be really Free (as in freedom), if its commercial use or
distribution are restricted.
So, no, in my own personal opinion, it would be the *opposite* of
optimal, if CC-by did *not* grant permission to use, copy, modify,
and/or redistribute for commercial purposes.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgp9kRnvR4nVS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved"
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved",
Heather Morrison, 04/13/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved", Frances Pinter, 04/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved",
Gregor Hagedorn, 04/13/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved", Gregory Maxwell, 04/13/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved", David Chart, 04/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved",
zotz, 04/16/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!,
Heather Morrison, 04/16/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!, Gregor Hagedorn, 04/17/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!,
drew Roberts, 04/17/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!,
Heather Morrison, 04/17/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!, Francesco Poli, 04/18/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!, zotz, 04/23/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!, Anthony, 04/24/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!, drew Roberts, 04/24/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!, Anthony, 04/24/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!, drew Roberts, 04/24/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!, Anthony, 04/24/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!,
Heather Morrison, 04/17/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!,
Heather Morrison, 04/16/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved",
Heather Morrison, 04/13/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.