Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Anthony <osm AT inbox.org>]

On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:10 AM, drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:
> Does everyone agree that a gpl cong used in a movie would require the movie 
> to
> be gpl?

Probably, in the vast majority of cases.  You could probably come up
with a counterexample, though (e.g. if the song and the moving picture
were randomly selected).

> So what about (also from that post):
>
> gpl or by-sa photograph -in-> book => book does not have to be gpl or by-sa

Depends if the photo is "separate and independent" from the rest of
the book.  If the book is just a collection of photos, I think that'd
fall under "separate and independent".  If the photos are described in
the text, that's probably not "separate and independent".  Somewhere
in between, and it's somewhere in between.