Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Saturday 21 January 2012 22:31:33 Anthony wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:28 PM, drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:
> > gpl music -in-> movie => does movie have to be gpl? make the case if you
> > say yes.
>
> Music in a movie is clearly a use for which a license is needed, at
> least under US law (see "synchronization rights" if you're not
> familiar with this).
>
> The only place I could see the GPL possibly permitting this would be
> under the "aggregation" clause.  But that would require that the music
> and moving picture are "separate and independent works" - they'd have
> to be written completely separately from each other, without the
> author of either having the other in mind, and would have to be
> synchronized haphazardly (for a three minute song, pick a random 3
> minute segment of the moving picture to play it in).  Even then I
> think you're stretching it.

Does everyone agree that a gpl cong used in a movie would require the movie 
to 
be gpl?

So what about (also from that post):

gpl or by-sa photograph -in-> book => book does not have to be gpl or by-sa

all the best,

drew