Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab AT web.de>]

Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2012, 10:02:47 schrieben Sie:
> > Do recipients of non-program works deserve fewer freedoms?
>
> In my mind, they do not deserve fewer freedoms. But in the mind of the
> folks  behind the GPL, they do deserve fewer freedoms. (To use that
> terminology.)

I think that misses the point of the GPL.

They want to ensure that people can actually exercise their freedoms and that
noone can take them away.

And that the GPLv2 survived for some 15 years before needing changes says a
lot about their foresight.

The measures they use for code can create some problems for non-code, though,
so having the option to use cc by-sa works in combined works under GPL when
adhering to the requirements of the GPL, but keeping cc by-sa as license, so
people can decide to use the works under cc by-sa when they don’t need
integration with GPL works would be optimal for me.

Best wishes,
Arne
--
Konstruktive Kritik:

- http://draketo.de/licht/krude-ideen/konstruktive-kritik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.