Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] 'Attribution' condition human-readable summary misleading

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Brianna Laugher" <brianna.laugher AT gmail.com>
  • To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] 'Attribution' condition human-readable summary misleading
  • Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 23:56:14 +1000

On 09/08/07, jonathon <jonathon.blake AT gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know the ground rules for Wikimedia, but his entire corpus
> would be removed from Wikipedia, for copyright/license infringement
> reasons. [Either the material is under CC-BY, or it is not. His
> stipulations are incompatible with CC-BY.]

Well I don't know how to interpret this statement given that Wikipedia
is part of Wikimedia.
The user in question was told his interpretation was unacceptable and
he chose to reword it.


> > His line of thinking is not totally unreasonable if you only read the
> > human summary.
>
> The Human Readable summary doesn't count. What matters is the
> wording of the legal code. [Something I'll wager that the majority
> of people have not read. I suspect that even fewer of them
> comprehend how it affects their art.]

I'm aware it 'doesn't count' legally, but it 'counts' for users who
are trying to be part of the free culture movement, and I'm sure CC
would rather be up-front with them about what they are doing rather
than give them nasty surprises later.

regards
Brianna


--
They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment:
http://modernthings.org/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page