Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] 'Attribution' condition human-readable summary misleading

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] 'Attribution' condition human-readable summary misleading
  • Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 18:52:45 -0400

On Wednesday 08 August 2007 06:42 pm, jonathon wrote:
> Brianna wrote:
>
> > "keep intact all copyright notices for the Work": does this mean if
> > someone puts a watermark on their image "(C) Someone 2007
> > SomeLicense", we are obliged to keep it? I hope not...
>
> Yes you are. One does not give up copyright by using a Creative
> Commons license. Furthermore, if the image does contain a watermark
> "(C) somebody 2007", the attribution requirements for the image have
> been met. That just leaves the user of the image with the
> responsibility of adding the URL.

I find this an interesting thought.

So, I license a photo BY-SA and put a (C) drew Roberts, 2007 in the lower
right corner of the photo.

Now, the license allows derivatives. But the "keep intact all copyright
notices for the Work" language means that someone can't make a derivative
which only uses the upper left portion of the photo, or the center portion of
the photo.

And if everyone puts such notices on the photos themselves, collages from
such
photos will look really nice.
>
> xan
>
> jonathon

all the best,

drew
--
(da idea man)
http://pc.celtx.com/profile/zotz




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page