Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Unbundling the GPL

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Joachim Durchholz <jo AT durchholz.org>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Unbundling the GPL
  • Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:46:26 +0200

Javier Candeira schrieb:
GPL v2 does protect the work from software patents.

Ah, I seem to have overlooked that one.

I have two nits to pick with your statement:

1) Software cannot be protected from patents. Protection from patents is something that can be granted to persons or companies, not to software. (This is slightly hair-splitting, but saying "the software is protected" doesn't make sure whether it's the licensor or the licensee who's protected.)

2) The protection that this license offers is rather marginal. No language in a license can protect the licensees from third-party patents.
Worse, this offers an opportunity for a nasty trick: if the license is advertised as "protects from patents", a company can create a subsidiary that owns and distributes GPL software that uses patents held by the parent company. The parent company stays silent about the patents, waits until the software is used by many people, then comes forth, announces the patent and collects.
With the right construction, the relationship between company and subsidiary need not even be public.
The only thing that helps against this kind of plot is the counterplot to any software patents: do the patent research, and good luck to you...

Nit (2) essentially says that the website should be very, very careful about claiming any kind of protection. Even if the website authors cannot be held responsible if somebody relies on the information given, a single case where somebody is damaged can destroy CC's reputation in no time at all.

Regards,
Jo




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page