Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts / Questions re ND

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andy Kaplan-Myrth <techlaw AT uottawa.ca>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts / Questions re ND
  • Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:03:17 -0400

Dana Powers wrote:
I honestly can't think of how you could digitally combine a musical
work with a video without synching. Even the most basic arrangement,
having both start simultaneously, seems to fit the definition.

I think one example would be a film scene with music in the background
of the scene. Imagine the scene takes place in a restaurant or bar with
CC-ND music playing in the background -- not as soundtrack that's been
added to become part of the scene, but music that's just going on in the
background of the scene. Or music that's on a car stereo in a car scene.
It hasn't been synchronized in a timed relation with the moving image,
it's just music going on in the background.

This isn't an adaptation of the song. I think the word "collection" is
confusing because this doesn't seem like a collection of a song and a
moving picture, but we should at least be able to agree that this isn't
an adaptation.

Cheers,
Andy



dp

On 4/10/07, Thinh Nguyen <thinh AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
The key distinction is between "Collections" and "Adaptations"--which is
subject to this "override" sentence: "For the avoidance of doubt, where the
Work is a musical work, performance or phonogram, the synchronization of the
Work in timed-relation with a moving image ("synching") will be considered
an Adaptation for the purpose of this License."

So if there is "synching" of the musical work to video, then the result is
always an Adaptation, which is not permitted under the ND license. However,
if the video and music are not synched, but instead meets the definition of
Collection (the relevant part of the definition being: "is included in its
entirety in unmodified form along with one or more other contributions, each
constituting separate and independent works in themselves"), then it is a
Collection and is permitted by the license.

So it would not be accurate to say that the video can only be blank or
noise, or that there are no circumstances under which you can combine video
and an musical work licensed under ND. However, in most circumstances, a
producer will probably want to introduce some element of synching in a
movie, so the ND license may not be the best choice if that is what you
intend the musical work to be used for.

Thinh Nguyen
Counsel, Science Commons



--
Andy Kaplan-Myrth LL.B., M.A.
Manager, Law & Technology, University of Ottawa

------------------------------------------------
Faculty of Law : Faculté de droit
University of Ottawa : Université d'Ottawa
57 Louis Pasteur Street
Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5
Canada

t. 613/562-5800 x3206
f. 613/562-5124
e. techlaw AT uottawa.ca
w: http://www.commonlaw.uottawa.ca/tech
------------------------------------------------




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page