cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too

From: "Gregory Maxwell" <gmaxwell AT gmail.com>
To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:52:00 -0500

On 2/12/07, drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:

My take is that CC should not list a license as compatible unless it is
reciprocal.

Why would someone bother making a license compatible then? Why not
simply make the new license an exact duplicate of the compatible cc
license? Doing so could only reduce the number of failure modes.

Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too , (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] � & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Terry Hancock, 02/10/2007
  - Re: [cc-licenses] � & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Evan Prodromou, 02/10/2007
    - Re: [cc-licenses] � & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Terry Hancock, 02/11/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, melanie dulong de rosnay, 02/10/2007
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Rob Myers, 02/10/2007
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Rob Myers, 02/10/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Rob Myers, 02/10/2007