cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] � & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too

From: Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com>
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] � & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 23:43:06 -0600

Mia Garlick wrote:
> An amended version of the draft Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (US) license
> is posted above. Please post any comments you have to this list.

My personal top priority would be to see the "Free Art License" and the
"Design Science License" be declared compatible with "By-SA".

However, I really want the *reverse* compatibility (i.e. blanket
permission to relicense derivatives of DSL and FAL works to By-SA --- or
By-SA+DSL+FAL triple-licensing, which is just fine with me).

Of course, I suspect that the TPM issue is going to keep snapping back
up to bite us in all of these cases. :-(

Cheers,
Terry

--
Terry Hancock (hancock AT AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpaceworks.com

Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too , (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] � & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Terry Hancock, 02/10/2007
  - Re: [cc-licenses] � & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Evan Prodromou, 02/10/2007
    - Re: [cc-licenses] � & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Terry Hancock, 02/11/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, melanie dulong de rosnay, 02/10/2007
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Rob Myers, 02/10/2007
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Rob Myers, 02/10/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too, Rob Myers, 02/10/2007