Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Evan Prodromou <evan AT prodromou.name>]

On Fri, 2006-01-12 at 12:37 +0000, rob AT robmyers.org wrote:
> >> >   Since the dominant argument against parallel distribution on this
> >> >   list seems to boil down to a critique that the clause provide a way
> >> >   to sidestep copyleft,
> >>
> >> The clause provides a way of removing people's rights.
> >
> > That's simply not true.
> 
> Your own diagram shows the rights that DRM removes.

Perhaps you didn't understand the diagram. It showed the situation now,
without a parallel distribution clause, and the situation if there were
a parallel distribution clause. If there is parallel distribution, more
net rights. 

I agree that in a world without DRM there would be more that people can
do. That wasn't my point, though.

~Evan

-- 
Evan Prodromou <evan AT prodromou.name>