cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement

From: rob AT robmyers.org
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Francesco Poli <frx AT firenze.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:41:35 +0000

Quoting Francesco Poli <frx AT firenze.linux.it>:

But the FSF seem to already confirm what I said on their official
GPL FAQ (see [1])

Thank you for explaining this.

To my mind this is clearly a weakness in the license that has been offset by the
current "large repository" development model, but I'm not sure how it could be
tackled better.

- Rob.

Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, rob, 12/01/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Francesco Poli, 12/02/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Greg London, 12/02/2006
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, James Grimmelmann, 12/02/2006
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Francesco Poli, 12/02/2006
      - Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, James Grimmelmann, 12/02/2006
        
        Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Francesco Poli, 12/02/2006
        
        [cc-licenses] Differences between the anti-DRM clauses in the U.S. and unported licenses, James Grimmelmann, 12/04/2006
        
        Re: [cc-licenses] Differences between the anti-DRM clauses in the U.S. and unported licenses, Francesco Poli, 12/04/2006
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Greg London, 12/02/2006
      - Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Terry Hancock, 12/04/2006