cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:12:26 -0500
On Monday 27 November 2006 09:28 am, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> <quote who="Greg London" date="Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 10:42:43AM -0500">
>
> > You haven't been involved in the discussion on this list so far,
> > and your first message is to let us know that you've posted a
> > piece encouraging people to come to this list advocating for
> > parallel distribution?
>
> I have read every message on this topic, on this list, including the
> ones you cite. We linked to Terry's article quoting your text. We
> mentioned that it was the strongest argument in favor of parallel
> distribution.
>
> I'm sorry that you found the language in our summary of your position
> weaker than your own. We understand but don't agree with your position
> so it seems unlikely that you'd agree with any treatment we'd give it.
Benjamin, I don't think that's fair. if you give other's points in the
strongest light you can or in their own words and still say you disagree,
that is one thing. When a person with a different view, reads your paper and
doesn't think his position is addressed, that is another.
I think your paper fell short in this way.
>
> James and I have both operated in good faith and I apologize if you feel
> that you've been misrepresented. We provided places to place comments on
> every place we posted the article. You have cut and pasted your message
> DRM Dave message to to each of them and reposted it verbatim to this
> list.
>
> There are half a dozen people who together have sent almost every mesage
> on this subject to this list over the last couple months. So far, we
> have elicted responses and discussion from those half-dozen people and
> from nobody else.
First, we would need to be clear that from Debian's point of view, you are
really only interested in BY and BY-SA creators in the first place.
I can tell you one thing. As for BY-SA creators, I don't know how many of us
there are. It certainly feels lonely around here. Most seem to love NC and ND
in their licenses.
>
> Regards,
> Mako
all the best,
drew
--
(da idea man)
National Novel Writing Month
http://www.nanowrimo.org/index.php
785,006,026 words and counting.
-
[cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
Benj. Mako Hill, 11/24/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, drew Roberts, 11/24/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
Greg London, 11/25/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, rob, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
Benj. Mako Hill, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
Benj. Mako Hill, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
Mike Linksvayer, 11/27/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Benj. Mako Hill, 11/27/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Rob Myers, 11/27/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Benj. Mako Hill, 11/27/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, Francesco Poli, 11/28/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
Mike Linksvayer, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
James Grimmelmann, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement, James Grimmelmann, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
Benj. Mako Hill, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement,
drew Roberts, 11/27/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.