cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses

From: "Greg London" <email AT greglondon.com>
To: nic AT suzor.com, "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 22:22:41 -0400 (EDT)

> Summary: I believe the licences should focus
> on the freedom of the content, not the
> monopoly of the players.

One could likewise argue that software patents
should not be restricted in a copyright license
for a FLOSS community. But I think that would
be a wrong move as well.

Greg

Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Evan Prodromou, 10/01/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, drew Roberts, 10/01/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Greg London, 10/01/2006
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Nic Suzor, 10/01/2006
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, drew Roberts, 10/01/2006
      - Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Nic Suzor, 10/01/2006
        
        Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, drew Roberts, 10/01/2006
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Greg London, 10/01/2006
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, drew Roberts, 10/01/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Rob Myers, 10/01/2006
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Rob Myers, 10/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 10/03/2006