cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 18:49:19 -0400
On Saturday 28 May 2005 03:40 pm, Mark Ivey wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 16:12 +0100, Rob Myers wrote:
> > The example I use for how providing source could look is is a Disney
> > DVD - look at all that preparatory art, the rough animation, deleted
> > scenes, 3D models, scripts, storyboards. Add the score and you're there.
>
> (I'm jumping in to the middle of this conversation, so hopefully I'm not
> going over old ground)
>
> Providing digital sources seems easy and useful: just provide whatever
> was used by the creator (even if it is in a difficult format like Adobe
> Dimensions, as mentioned in your link)
>
> How would one provide non-digital sources though? To use your example,
> the sources for the hand-drawn Disney cartoons are individual hand-drawn
> frames. Would a digitized form be good enough? What about a fine-art
> photograph where the source is a negative?
This is why I wanted to limit the initial discussion to digital music. If we
can't get anywhere with such a limited area, we have no hope with the rest.
If we get somewhere useful, the process may lead to insights when we come to
consider other areas.
Does this idea make sense to anyone?
all the best,
drew
>
> -Mark Ivey-
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
--
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22drew%20Roberts%22
-
Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion
, (continued)
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Greg London, 05/25/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/25/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Greg London, 05/25/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/25/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/25/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Greg London, 05/26/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/26/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Greg London, 05/26/2005
- Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/28/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Mark Ivey, 05/28/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/28/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/28/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Mark Ivey, 05/29/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/29/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/30/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/30/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/29/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/30/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/30/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Matt Burrows, 05/26/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/26/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.