cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion
- From: Mark Ivey <zovirl1_list AT sbcglobal.net>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 12:40:00 -0700
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 16:12 +0100, Rob Myers wrote:
> The example I use for how providing source could look is is a Disney
> DVD - look at all that preparatory art, the rough animation, deleted
> scenes, 3D models, scripts, storyboards. Add the score and you're there.
(I'm jumping in to the middle of this conversation, so hopefully I'm not
going over old ground)
Providing digital sources seems easy and useful: just provide whatever
was used by the creator (even if it is in a difficult format like Adobe
Dimensions, as mentioned in your link)
How would one provide non-digital sources though? To use your example,
the sources for the hand-drawn Disney cartoons are individual hand-drawn
frames. Would a digitized form be good enough? What about a fine-art
photograph where the source is a negative?
-Mark Ivey-
-
Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion
, (continued)
-
Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion,
Rob Myers, 05/25/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Greg London, 05/25/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/25/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Greg London, 05/25/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/25/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/25/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Greg London, 05/26/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/26/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Greg London, 05/26/2005
- Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/28/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Mark Ivey, 05/28/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/28/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/28/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Mark Ivey, 05/29/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/29/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/30/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/30/2005
-
Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion,
Rob Myers, 05/25/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/29/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Rob Myers, 05/30/2005
- Re: Requiring Source [Was Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, drew Roberts, 05/30/2005
- Re: Draft License 2.5 - Now open for discussion, Matt Burrows, 05/26/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.