Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>]

>>>>> "RM" == Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com> writes:

    RM> I'm disturbed at the removal of 5a. It should be revised to
    RM> clarify that it refers to contributed work only, which is a
    RM> no-brainer and removes the requirement for a Linux-style
    RM> defense fund for when the SCO of Open Content arrives. I know
    RM> the Blogosphere squealed about it, but it's no less than any
    RM> author is claiming when they distribute a work and future
    RM> generations will thank CC for it.

I'm curious as to why sections 5.a.i and 5.a.ii aren't struck out. Was
that a typography oversight?

~ESP

-- 
Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide