Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-europe - Re: [Cc-europe] cc0 waiver

cc-europe AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Cc-europe mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: <P.Tsiavos AT lse.ac.uk>
  • To: <florian.philapitsch AT wu-wien.ac.at>, <cc-europe AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [Cc-europe] cc0 waiver
  • Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:04:05 +0100

I think the best way to move ahead is indeed having a workshop on this issue
as Paul has suggested both in the Vilnius meeting and on the list. Each of
the European projects could then in advance make suggestions in relation to
the applicability of a CC_0 like system in their respective jurisdictions.

All I would add to Florian's comments (most of which find me in full
agreement) is that CC_BY is not a complete waiver of the economic rights. On
the contrary, it is a non-exclusive licence and the rights of the author
(even the economic ones) are explicitly reserved. The freedoms awarded to the
licensee are conditioned upon certain terms and IMHO this is one of the
primary differences between CC_BY and CC_0. I take Florian's comment to mean
that CCBY is the closest we have to a waiver from the perspective of a
European Author's right system. Perhaps the next stage would be to examine
how could we may move further from CC_BY toward the direction of CC_0 while
keeping in mind our jurisdictional limitations.

Needless to say that we need this CC-0 workshop sooner than later...Will
anyone be presenting a relevant paper in the Leuven conference?

best wishes.
pRo





Message-----
From: cc-europe-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org on behalf of Florian Philapitsch
Sent: Fri 4/18/2008 10:52 AM
To: cc-europe AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [Cc-europe] cc0 waiver

That is an interesting (and difficult) question.

A possible solution (to get closer to CC0, which, however IMO can
never be completely reached in European copyright systems) lies within
the distinction between the dualistic and the monistic copyright-theory.
The monistic theory claims that the moral rights and the economic
rights of the creator can not be sperated from each other. Copyright
in this system is more or less a giant undividable blob. The only two
countries (to my knowledge) choosing this system in Europe are Germany
and Austria.
The dualistic theory claims that these two groups of rights can be
seperated. In dualistic copyright systems the economic rights are
transferrable and therefore waivable. The best example for a dualistic
system is France. (Cf. Art. L. 131-4 CPI: " La cession par l'auteur de
ses droits sur son oeuvre peut être totale ou partielle. [...] ").

Now, CC0 COULD work with a dualistic system as far as only the
economic rights are waived. A waiving of the moral rights however
would never be possible. The funny thing is, especially when speaking
about the "evolution" of copyright, that this naturalistic theory
itself is rather "new" (in the light of European culture), and was
brought up by people like Rousseau and Kant.
In fact, moral rights should be unwaivable in all the countries which
signed the Berne Convention:

"Article 6bis
(1) Independently of the author's economic rights, and even after the
transfer of the said rights, the author shall have the right to claim
authorship of the work and to object to any distortion, mutilation or
other modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to, the
said work, which would be prejudicial to his honor or reputation."

As you see, even here ecomonic rights are deemed transferrable while
the transfer or waiving of moral rights is not mentioned. Yes, the US
signed the BC as well, but hey, what do they care about international
treaties :)
So, in Europe we could have something like a CC0 for economic rights
for all the countries which base their copyright systems on a
dualistic idea.

As I said, this is a rather complicated discussion but it is quite
clear that CC0 in this form does not stand a chance here. A complete
waiver of economic rights, however is already implemented in the CC-BY
license...

This would be a great topic for the legal day IMO :)

kind regards from Vienna,
Florian

Zitat von Francois Dechelle <francois AT dechelle.net>:

> Thank you very much for the clear explanation.
>
> When I was saying that the law can evolve, I was not suggesting at all
> that it should evolve toward the US-model, I was just asking if it would
> be possible to consider within the European model the possibility of a
> "voluntary public domain". It looks like the answer is no, but I may be
> wrong?
>
> Best,
> François
>
> Le jeudi 17 avril 2008 à 17:28 +0200, Florian Philapitsch a écrit :
>> Dear all,
>>
>> same goes for Austria (and Germany) and almost certainly for every
>> European country.
>> The reason for this is the difference between the European and the
>> US-American copyright model.
>> As you all know, in European Law, copyright can be divided in
>> exploitation rights and moral rights. The exploitation rights which are
>> originally exclusive to the author include among others the right of
>> reproduction, communication to the public, distribution, adaptation,
>> fixation, rental and broadcasting. The moral rights (droit morale) stem
>> from French copyright and have been introduced in international
>> copyright law. They include the right to claim authorship of a work and
>> the right to object to any distortion or other derogatory action in
>> relation to the work which would be prejudical to the author's honour or
>> reputation. Moral rights are independent from the economic rights of an
>> author and can neither be transferred nor waived.
>> The globL concept of copyright is based on two different approaches: the
>> (continental) European concept stems from naturalistic ideals: a work
>> belongs to it's creator, the author, he is granted utmost control over
>> his creation. The utilitarian concept of copyright is the core-idea
>> behind Anglo-American copyright law:
>>
>> As you see, European copyright is also (!) about the "sacred bond"
>> between a creator and his/her works. This bond can not be broken by
>> waiving. This means, CC0 will not work in Europe in any way. IMO this is
>> no bad thing at all, but this is a legal/political discussion of great
>> depth and length :)
>>
>> Sure, law can evolve, but I highly doubt if the European copyright
>> should evolve in the direction of the merely economically motivated
>> US-model.
>>
>> kind regards from Vienna,
>> Florian
>>
>> Francois Dechelle schrieb:
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > I think it is impossible as well in France. The idea of a "voluntary
>> > public domain" has been addressed but has raised a clear opposition, for
>> > instance from collecting societies.
>> >
>> > I have no idea of other possible solutions. My impression is that, given
>> > the current state of the law, it is not possible, but after all, the law
>> > can evolve?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > François
>> >
>> > Le jeudi 17 avril 2008 à 16:43 +0200, Alek Tarkowski a écrit :
>> >> Dear all,
>> >>
>> >> I am writing in regard to Mike's announcement of the discussion around
>> >> CC0 waiver. In Poland such a waiver (that is, a public domain
>> >> dedication) is not possible by law, I imagine the situation might be
>> >> similar in other European countries as well.
>> >>
>> >> Somehow this has not been addressed on our list - and I feel uncertain
>> >> doing it myself, as I am not a lawyer! But personally I would like to
>> >> know what can be done - is this a good opportunity for us to look for
>> >> other solutions that would allow such waiving? or to clarify the fact
>> >> that this is indeed impossible in some jurisdictions?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> Alek
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Cc-europe mailing list
>> > Cc-europe AT lists.ibiblio.org
>> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-europe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cc-europe mailing list
> Cc-europe AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-europe
>



_______________________________________________
Cc-europe mailing list
Cc-europe AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-europe


Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
communications disclaimer:
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/secretariat/legal/disclaimer.htm




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page