bluesky AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Global-Scale Distributed Storage Systems
List archive
- From: "Timm Murray" <admin AT madtimes.com>
- To: <bluesky AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Naming via SDSI
- Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 17:14:23 -0500
hal AT finney.org wrote on 3/6/01 9:08 am:
>How would that work in a P2P
>model? If we did have
>competing name lookup
>services (using Wei's term
>from the three service
>model), would there have to
>be some global mechanism
>to make sure that no two
>services tried to handle the
>same addresses? Or would
>we accept that address to
>name mapping was
>inherently ambiguous? Or,
>perhaps, would TLDs have to
>have unfriendly unforgeable
>names?
In Freenet Name Service (FNS, see eof.sourceforge.net) there
are no TLDs. I suspect people will make psedo-TLDs, but there
is no technical reason to do so.
Interfacing with other P2P DNS systems is something I have not
considered. Thoughts?
Timm Murray
-----------
Great spirits have allways encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds
--Albert Einstein
-
RE: Naming via SDSI
, (continued)
- RE: Naming via SDSI, Lucas Gonze, 03/07/2001
- RE: Naming via SDSI, hal, 03/07/2001
- RE: Naming via SDSI, Lucas Gonze, 03/07/2001
- RE: Naming via SDSI, hal, 03/07/2001
- RE: Naming via SDSI, Lucas Gonze, 03/07/2001
- RE: Naming via SDSI, hal, 03/07/2001
- Re: Naming via SDSI, Oskar Sandberg, 03/07/2001
- Re: Naming via SDSI, hal, 03/07/2001
- RE: Naming via SDSI, Lucas Gonze, 03/07/2001
- Re: Naming via SDSI, Oskar Sandberg, 03/07/2001
- Re: Naming via SDSI, Timm Murray, 03/10/2001
- Re: Naming via SDSI, hal, 03/10/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.