Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21­27

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: George Athas <George.Athas AT moore.edu.au>
  • To: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21­27
  • Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 08:21:42 +0000

Oh yes, I know of the interpretation (and even once held to it myself), but the rationale for it seems to be working with assumptions that are not actually expressed in the text.


GEORGE ATHAS
Dean of Research,
Moore Theological College (moore.edu.au)
Sydney, Australia


From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, 20 October 2012 6:12 AM
To: George Athas <george.athas AT moore.edu.au>
Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21­27

George:

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:43 AM, George Athas <George.Athas AT moore.edu.au> wrote:
Just to continue the conversation, though, could you let me know why you think the 69-week period is divided into a 7-week and 62-weeks period?

I know the answer to this even though I disagree with it: it is believed that the 7 sevens and 62 sevens mentioned in Daniel 9 are consecutive, yet real intervals.

I thought you had already heard of this interpretation of the passage.

Karl W. Randolph.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page