b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Charles Grebe <cgrebe AT briercrest.ca>
- To: Donald Vance <donaldrvance AT me.com>
- Cc: "b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:26:02 +0000
Oh, how true. I've fallen for that one before too. I must look for that
missing dagesh lene! :)
Charles Grebe
Director of Continuing and Distance Education Briercrest College and Seminary
Caronport, SK, Canada
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald Vance [mailto:donaldrvance AT me.com]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 7:19 PM
To: Charles Grebe
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph
It is not in a closed syllable, therefore it is a qamats. The schwa under the
third bet is vocal (or at least medial) as indicated by the absence of a
dagesh lene in the kaph.
Donald R. Vance, Ph.D.
Professor of Biblical Languages and Literature Oral Roberts University
dvance AT oru.edu donaldrvance AT mac.com
-
[b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph,
Charles Grebe, 01/20/2012
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph,
Charles Grebe, 01/20/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph,
Pere Porta, 01/21/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph, Charles Grebe, 01/21/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph, Isaac Fried, 01/21/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph,
Pere Porta, 01/21/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph,
Charles Grebe, 01/20/2012
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph, Isaac Fried, 01/21/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.