Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Beit/Veit

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
  • To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Beit/Veit
  • Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:36:28 +0300

Hi Rivka,

Let's see if I can add anything useful after Karl and Kevin's answers.

Actually, your question should be about all six BGDKPT letters, not just
Bet. Most scholars consider the "soft" (un-dageshed/frictive) sounds to be
"secondary", that is, not an original, built-in feature of Biblical Hebrew.
This is unlike Shin and Sin or Ayin and Ghayin, in which the same
letter-sign was used for what were originally two different sounds. At some
point in time, when the BGDKPT letters followed a vowel, people began
pronouncing them "softer". It didn't have to happen at the same time for all
six, and perhaps not for all speakers of Hebrew. What we know is that by the
time of the Tiberian Masoretes, this feature had become "regular" enough, at
least in their dialect, for them to formalize it as a rule of grammar by
"inventing" the Dagesh Kal.

Since we don't have recordings of people speaking Hebrew in antiquity, there
is no way that we can really know how a particular letter was pronounced at
any specific time or in any specific place. However, we do have
translations, and especially transliterations of Hebrew words (mostly proper
nouns) into other languages, and of course the most useful of these for the
Second Temple Period is Greek. Now this is not an exact science either,
because we have the same questions about exactly how Greek was pronounced at
any given time or place. But in general, we can assume that Greek used Kappa
to transcribe Kaph and Chi transcribe Khaph, Pi for Pe and Phi for Phe, Tau for Tav and Theta for Thav (soft Tav - although there is a question of just how Greek pronounced these letters at the time). From these examples we can see, the differences between "hard" and "soft" did not follow what later became the Mesoretic rules. For example, Pe and Kaph at the begining of a word were often pronounced "softly", or at least that's what the traslators heard.
As to the specifc issue of Bet/Vet, as Karl mentioned, the Greek of the time did not have a "v" sound, so when they wrote Beta, we have no way of knowing whether they heard B or V.

Hope that helps, and any and all corrections are welcome.

Yigal Levin


----- Original Message ----- From: "Yodan" <yodan AT yodanco.com>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 9:12 PM
Subject: [b-hebrew] Beit/Veit



Shalom!



I don't know if this question was discussed in this group, but I'm curious
to know if anyone knows (and, hopefully, has a reference for it) if Veit
(that's Beit without dagesh) was pronounced in "ancient times" (say at the
time of the Septuagint or later, during the first millennium CE, say at
the
time of the Masoretes) as a V or as a soft B (like the Spanish B which is
also used by some Sephardi Jews).



Thanks in advance.





Rivka Sherman-Gold



*********************************

YODAN Publishing

P.O. Box 60655

Palo Alto, CA 94306-0655

650-494-6994

Rivka AT Yodanco.com



**********************************







_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.0/2068 - Release Date: 04/19/09
20:04:00





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page