Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Brak <Brak AT neo.rr.com>]

Yitzhak Sapir wrote:
> I don't understand.  First you insist on complete orthographical similarity.
> Then, you go ahead and remove prefixes as if they don't matter at all.
> You refuse to further elaborate on your question saying you won't validate
> your question, but don't understand why we don't understand the question.
> Maybe you should look to the queen or her king to give you the answer.
> Or is that not good enough?
I am still insisting on graphic similarity - I am just narrowing the 
focus down to just the base of the word - ignoring the prefix and suffix 
morpheme.

I have been elaborating quite a bit - trying to ask the same question 
almost 100 different ways - modifying it, changing the terms I'm using, 
etc. Then you complain when I modify the question!!!

The first problem is that you don't believe me.
When I say you haven't answered my question - instead of arguing as to 
whether you answered it, try believing me.

So with the example:
<H:A/$OM"R> vs <HA/$.OM"R>

The "base" parts are :
<$OM"R> vs <$.OM"R>
They both have the exact same letters.
They both have the exact same vowels.
One has a dagesh - one doesn't.
But they have the same meaning: Qal Participle Masculine Singular

Is there ever a case that a word will have all of the above criteria, 
except that the words have different meaning?