Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Tory Thorpe <torythrp AT yahoo.com>]

My response pushes no ideology whatsoever.

Tory Thorpe


--- K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com> wrote:

> Tory:
> 
> Your response is exactly why I responded as I did to
> Jim Cunningham.
> This can very easily devolve to a useless argument
> as we each push our
> own ideologies, for the reason I accept one meaning
> is according to my
> ideology, and the reason for yours below is
> according to your
> ideology. The best answer of many would best be, "I
> disagree with you,
> let's go on to the next subject."
> 
> Karl W. Randolph.
> 
> On 7/9/07, Tory Thorpe <torythrp AT yahoo.com> wrote:
> > --- "Rev. Jim Cunningham"
> <kjv_gods_word AT yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >   ... Alma specifically means
> > > a maiden or damsel - a young woman who has not
> been
> > > married/sexually touched. There is no such thing
> as
> > > an "alma" who has had sex.
> >
> > Yes there is. Physical virginity is not implicit
> in
> > either alma or betulah.
> >
> > Tory Thorpe
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>