b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues
- From: Peter Kirk <peter AT qaya.org>
- To: Robert Newman <rob AT designceramics.co.uk>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:24:21 +0100
On 29/03/2007 01:20, Robert Newman wrote:
Hello Peter,Or else there is an error in the lexicon in Bibleworks. I accept that PROSFERW may have this meaning elsewhere in the Bible, and "offer up" may also have this meaning although this is not used in this verse in NIV. But it clearly does not have this meaning in this verse because we all know what actually happened. And in fact it is not the normal meaning of the Greek verb either. It is perverse to insist that a word found in the Bible, in Greek and in English, must be being used in a particular technical sense and then reject that meaning as factually incorrect, when there is no problem of fact if the word is taken in its regular sense.
I think what Rolf has observed and what you may not have considered is that 'offer up' as a
biblical idiom in the context of sacrifice seems to refer to the whole process of making a
sacrifice, not just the bringing of the gift to the place of sacrifice and presenting it there
but the complete presentation to God. Looking at PROSFERW in the lexicons on Bibleworks I notice
one cites Heb 11:17 and there gives "to offer up, i.e. immolate, one". The translators
of NIV evidently understood this because they have "about to sacrifice" where the Greek
uses PROSFERW. If in the context of sacrafice 'offer' does refer to the whole process, including
the immolation (sacraficial slaughter) of the victim, Isaac was not 'offered' because he was not
sacrificed. So either the word PROSFERW signals something different in 17a to 17b, or there is a
contradiction, or the contrasting verb forms signal something different about the action in 17a
to 17b.
--
Peter Kirk
E-mail: peter AT qaya.org
Blog: http://www.qaya.org/blog/
Website: http://www.qaya.org/
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues
, (continued)
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Rolf Furuli, 03/28/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Peter Kirk, 03/28/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Harold Holmyard, 03/29/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Rolf Furuli, 03/29/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Peter Kirk, 03/29/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Rolf Furuli, 03/28/2007
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, K Randolph, 03/29/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Peter Kirk, 03/29/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, davidfentonism, 03/29/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
K Randolph, 03/29/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
David Kummerow, 03/30/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, K Randolph, 03/30/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
David Kummerow, 03/30/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.