b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues
- From: Peter Kirk <peter AT qaya.org>
- To: Yitzhak Sapir <yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com>
- Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:12:58 +0100
On 26/03/2007 17:15, Yitzhak Sapir wrote:
Dear All, ...It seems to me that "minimalist" and "maximalist" must refer respectively to people who hold a minimum or a maximum amount of the Bible to be historically true. So presumably a true minimalist finds nothing of historical value in the Bible, whereas a true maximalist must accept it all as literally true, even down to the six day creation 6000 or so years ago. Any position between these two, in my opinion, cannot properly be described as either "minimalist" or "maximalist", and if these terms are used this is probably a matter of rhetorical and probably pejorative exaggeration. So it probably isn't very helpful to use these terms on this list.
--
Peter Kirk
E-mail: peter AT qaya.org
Blog: http://www.qaya.org/blog/
Website: http://www.qaya.org/
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Peter Kirk, 03/25/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Bill Rea, 03/25/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Peter Kirk, 03/26/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Godwin's Law and Gershman's Corollary,
Arthur Gershman, 03/26/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Godwin's Law and Gershman's Corollary, Peter Kirk, 03/26/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Godwin's Law and Gershman's Corollary,
Tory Thorpe, 03/26/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Godwin's Law and Gershman's Corollary, Tory Thorpe, 03/26/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Godwin's Law and Gershman's Corollary,
Arthur Gershman, 03/26/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Peter Kirk, 03/26/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Yitzhak Sapir, 03/26/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Harold Holmyard, 03/26/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Harold Holmyard, 03/26/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Peter Kirk, 03/26/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Yitzhak Sapir, 03/26/2007
-
Message not available
-
[b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
davidfentonism, 03/27/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Yitzhak Sapir, 03/28/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Peter Kirk, 03/28/2007
- Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Yitzhak Sapir, 03/28/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Yitzhak Sapir, 03/28/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, davidfentonism, 03/28/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Kevin Riley, 03/28/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, davidfentonism, 03/29/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, davidfentonism, 03/29/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Harold Holmyard, 03/29/2007
-
[b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
davidfentonism, 03/27/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Bill Rea, 03/25/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Peter Kirk, 03/25/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.