b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues
- From: Peter Kirk <peter AT qaya.org>
- To: Revdpickrel AT wmconnect.com
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:08:00 +0000
On 23/03/2007 20:10, Revdpickrel AT wmconnect.com wrote:
In a message dated 3/23/2007 4:23:24 AM Central Standard Time, peter AT qaya.org writes:
> ...
> Several times when dealing with people on this list with whom I
> disagree, I make my point, show what I think is a flaw in the other's
> position, and if he does not answer them, just ignore him. ...
If there is no further answer, I ignore the person. If the person
repeats a logical or factual error, perhaps in a rather different form,
I repeat my objection. I don't want the other person to win the argument
by mere repetition. Who was it who said that a lie repeated often enough
becomes the truth?
Capt. Kirk,
Is this the way the college debate team argued their points of view, by just ignoring the opposing team? ...
Indeed not, that's why I am not ignoring others. They can try to ignore me, I don't care.
... Maybe the other person has a valid argument, just because he differs from you doesn't make him wrong, does it?I have clearly demonstrated repeatedly the serious flaws in the other person's argument.
--
Peter Kirk
E-mail: peter AT qaya.org
Blog: http://www.qaya.org/blog/
Website: http://www.qaya.org/
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
K Randolph, 03/22/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Peter Kirk, 03/23/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
K Randolph, 03/23/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Peter Kirk, 03/24/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Arthur Gershman, 03/24/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Peter Kirk, 03/24/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] House of My War, Tory Thorpe, 03/26/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, K Randolph, 03/24/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
K Randolph, 03/23/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Peter Kirk, 03/23/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
K Randolph, 03/22/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues, Peter Kirk, 03/23/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Peter Kirk, 03/25/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Bill Rea, 03/25/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Peter Kirk, 03/26/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Godwin's Law and Gershman's Corollary,
Arthur Gershman, 03/26/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Godwin's Law and Gershman's Corollary, Peter Kirk, 03/26/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Godwin's Law and Gershman's Corollary,
Tory Thorpe, 03/26/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Godwin's Law and Gershman's Corollary, Tory Thorpe, 03/26/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Godwin's Law and Gershman's Corollary,
Arthur Gershman, 03/26/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Peter Kirk, 03/26/2007
-
Re: [b-hebrew] how scholars debate controversial issues,
Bill Rea, 03/25/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.